Gmoccapy 3.5.0 - opinions needed
12 Jan 2025 20:05 #318820
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Gmoccapy 3.5.0 - opinions needed
Seems to work on axis (2.10):
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 Jan 2025 06:33 - 13 Jan 2025 06:35 #318855
by newbynobi
Replied by newbynobi on topic Gmoccapy 3.5.0 - opinions needed
Hallo Hans,
I do like your modifications. I prefer the progress bar under the g-code.
About the Icon it's just a matter of taste IMHO, I do not like the black and white icon, but I also see the need to reorder the button to reduce mouse movement.
G-code Properties is a nice feature, witch I would like to see
Even knowing that the values shown are not correct in most cases. But they do give a first impresion!
About the File Chooser widget, I was thinking for long time about a Widget designed like the Midnight Commander but unfortunately I have not even started to write the first line of code .
Norbert
I do like your modifications. I prefer the progress bar under the g-code.
About the Icon it's just a matter of taste IMHO, I do not like the black and white icon, but I also see the need to reorder the button to reduce mouse movement.
G-code Properties is a nice feature, witch I would like to see
Even knowing that the values shown are not correct in most cases. But they do give a first impresion!
About the File Chooser widget, I was thinking for long time about a Widget designed like the Midnight Commander but unfortunately I have not even started to write the first line of code .
Norbert
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 Jan 2025 22:01 - 13 Jan 2025 22:04 #318889
by HansU
This file gives me this. Still an emtpy tool list:
Also a bit weird that it has the tools 0, 3, 1 in the list in Axis, but there is only T3 and T1 in that file.
Me too
We can also have this icon in yellow, no problem
You mean that one that looks like the Norton Commander, so text based only?
Replied by HansU on topic Gmoccapy 3.5.0 - opinions needed
Seems to work on axis (2.10):
This file gives me this. Still an emtpy tool list:
G-code properties: {'name': 'gmoccapy_2_tools_with_cutter_radius_compensation.ngc', 'size': '1234 bytes\n93 gcode lines', 'g0': '58.000 mm', 'g1': '327.121 mm', 'run': '25 Seconds', 'toollist': [], 'x': '31.000 to 69.000 = 38.000 mm', 'x_zero_rxy': '31.000 to 69.000 = 38.000 mm', 'y': '31.000 to 69.000 = 38.000 mm', 'y_zero_rxy': '31.000 to 69.000 = 38.000 mm', 'z': '-252.287 to -221.287 = 31.000 mm', 'z_zero_rxy': '-252.287 to -221.287 = 31.000 mm', 'machine_unit_sys': 'Metric', 'gcode_units': 'mm'}Also a bit weird that it has the tools 0, 3, 1 in the list in Axis, but there is only T3 and T1 in that file.
I prefer the progress bar under the g-code.
Me too
About the Icon it's just a matter of taste IMHO, I do not like the black and white icon, but I also see the need to reorder the button to reduce mouse movement.
We can also have this icon in yellow, no problem
About the File Chooser widget, I was thinking for long time about a Widget designed like the Midnight Commander but unfortunately I have not even started to write the first line of code .
You mean that one that looks like the Norton Commander, so text based only?
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 Jan 2025 22:10 #318891
by HansU
The question is only how to handle the embedded tab location "box_tool_and_code_info" (linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/gui/images/...py_embedded_tabs.png).
Should that replace the complete notebook with both tabs or only the content within the first tab?
The first would be better for backward compatibility but the latter would make more sense.
Replied by HansU on topic Gmoccapy 3.5.0 - opinions needed
G-code Properties is a nice feature, witch I would like to see
Even knowing that the values shown are not correct in most cases. But they do give a first impresion!
The question is only how to handle the embedded tab location "box_tool_and_code_info" (linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/gui/images/...py_embedded_tabs.png).
Should that replace the complete notebook with both tabs or only the content within the first tab?
The first would be better for backward compatibility but the latter would make more sense.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: newbynobi, HansU
Time to create page: 0.115 seconds