Using Powermax with RS485
Its annoying that master branch does not get the images.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Yes, you need to make sure you are using the docs relevant to the version you are running.I have found its not enough to use google to find a link. You always need to got to linuxcnc.org and follow through to the docs so you get the right info.
Thats the risk you take using master.Its annoying that master branch does not get the images.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Yes, you need to make sure you are using the docs relevant to the version you are running.I have found its not enough to use google to find a link. You always need to got to linuxcnc.org and follow through to the docs so you get the right info.
Thats the risk you take using master.Its annoying that master branch does not get the images.
Phill. I am going this route. From linuxcnc forum.linuxcnc.org/plasmac/37234-plasmac-documentation#143121
then looking at section 30.3
I am using 2.8.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I will remove the link to the PlasmaC docs on master.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
OK, if you use the link to LinucCNC 2.8 it works.
I will remove the link to the PlasmaC docs on master.
Yes thanks Phil I know that the two are different but it is confusing when the manual docs point to the wrong place.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
OK, if you use the link to LinucCNC 2.8 it works.
I will remove the link to the PlasmaC docs on master.
Yes thanks Phil I know that the two are different but it is confusing when the manual docs point to the wrong place.
Fixed
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
OK, if you use the link to LinucCNC 2.8 it works.
I will remove the link to the PlasmaC docs on master.
Yes thanks Phil I know that the two are different but it is confusing when the manual docs point to the wrong place.
Fixed
That was quick and it works correctly now, Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Thats the risk you take using master.
Personally, I think thats bullshit. Its actually a consequence of the dev team not rolling out 2.8 to replace V 2.7 in a timely fashion once they branched it off the master branch. 2.7, 2.8 and 2.9 (master) should have only existed side by side for a matter of weeks, not years and years. Heck guys, I've never used the stable branch (2.7 when I started) becasue it never supported what I wanted. I;ve always used master, why would I change?
I checked out some forum datestamps and saw that I was sharing components for 2.8 on this forum over three years ago. Now we have a situation where some enhancements to master are being rolled back to V 2.8. Its really piss poor in my view and is holding the project back.
Yes I know, people will say open source, no warranty blah, blah, blah but really we are custodians of a brand and its up to us all to keep that brand moving forward. What we've done over the last couple of years has really hurt the brand.
Please fix it!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.