- Posts: 43
- Thank you received: 15
Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
- jschulze
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
1 year 1 month ago - 1 year 1 month ago #334249
by jschulze
Replied by jschulze on topic Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
Just wanted to say thanks for all the work on this. I just got it working on my machine. I don't have a nutating head, but settings the angle to 90 worked perfectly. Also, since I have 2 c axis I edited the kinematics to pass through an additional W axis for the rotating table.
Last edit: 1 year 1 month ago by jschulze.
The following user(s) said Thank You: besriworld, jpg, Daan96
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4819
- Thank you received: 2177
1 year 1 month ago #334253
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
Nice, thanks for reporting back.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jschulze
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 43
- Thank you received: 15
1 year 1 month ago #334606
by jschulze
Replied by jschulze on topic Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
Sorry, for all the questions, but I'm having a bit of trouble with TWP and was hoping I could get some help. TCP is working totally fine and it seems like TWP is partially working, but not quite correctly. Say I issue G68.2 X0Y0Z0 I0J-45K0 and G53.1, the spindle orients itself correctly and I can jog in X and Y, but not Z. Depending on the angles I use I get different axes I can jog. Using G68.3 I can see the plane set in the vismach, but I'm not able to jog at all.
I did mess with the kinematics file to make it work for my machine. TCP works great, so it seems to be working (I added a tandem Y axis and a W axis that isn't involved in the tcp math). Is there anything I could have messed up in the kinematics file? Also, I had to scale some things in the vismach since I'm working in inches. Is there anything in the twp remap files that I would need to scale? Thanks again for all the help.
I did mess with the kinematics file to make it work for my machine. TCP works great, so it seems to be working (I added a tandem Y axis and a W axis that isn't involved in the tcp math). Is there anything I could have messed up in the kinematics file? Also, I had to scale some things in the vismach since I'm working in inches. Is there anything in the twp remap files that I would need to scale? Thanks again for all the help.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4819
- Thank you received: 2177
1 year 1 month ago #334611
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
Can you post your modified kinemaitics file and your ini file?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jschulze
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 43
- Thank you received: 15
1 year 1 month ago #334668
by jschulze
Replied by jschulze on topic Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
Here's all my files. I've included .ini, .hal, and kinematics comp file.Can you post your modified kinemaitics file and your ini file?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
- Offline
- Administrator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4819
- Thank you received: 2177
1 year 1 month ago #334676
by Aciera
Replied by Aciera on topic Kinematic model for a 5axis mill with universal (nutating) head
I've replaced the standard kinematic file with your modified version, added extra joints and changed the config to inches to test in the simulation but I cannot reproduce your jogging issue in TWP mode.
I'm afraid I'm a bit at a loss as to how to troubleshoot this further.
I'm afraid I'm a bit at a loss as to how to troubleshoot this further.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.278 seconds