- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
12 years 9 months ago #42552
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Better yet - could you isolate a short snippit of gcode that does it?
I am playing with the axis xyzabcuvw config and am not seeing it in the preview. Do you see it in the preview also?
thanks
sam
I am playing with the axis xyzabcuvw config and am not seeing it in the preview. Do you see it in the preview also?
thanks
sam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4793
- Thank you received: 1480
12 years 9 months ago - 12 years 9 months ago #42558
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
The the g-code programs posted above are these same carvings.
I do not see it in the preview, mostly because the W axis is not realy shown in the preview.
This machine configuration is a servo set up, and the problem might be magnified by a tuning issue. But I kind of doubt it since it doesn't show up with the old planner.
In the above g-code 130207LWZ.ngc the first errors start to be seen around line #13-15 and #17-19. That is the first tick carved on the clock face. The problem is visible on all of the ticks arround the clock. With the same mistake on the same corners of each one. This first tick begins the carving at the top left corner and continues clockwise around the shape. the 2nd and 4th corners carved are the ones where the mistake is seen.
Sraingly enough the very last thing carved in the file is the tick right next to the very first one. This one starts at the corner farthest left, then continues clockwise. So that the 2nd corner carved is the one that was carved 1st on the very first tick. On this last tick the errors are seen on the same corners as the first one, but are the corners that are carved 1st, 3rd (and last it finishes where it started) are where the error is seen.
I do not see it in the preview, mostly because the W axis is not realy shown in the preview.
This machine configuration is a servo set up, and the problem might be magnified by a tuning issue. But I kind of doubt it since it doesn't show up with the old planner.
In the above g-code 130207LWZ.ngc the first errors start to be seen around line #13-15 and #17-19. That is the first tick carved on the clock face. The problem is visible on all of the ticks arround the clock. With the same mistake on the same corners of each one. This first tick begins the carving at the top left corner and continues clockwise around the shape. the 2nd and 4th corners carved are the ones where the mistake is seen.
Sraingly enough the very last thing carved in the file is the tick right next to the very first one. This one starts at the corner farthest left, then continues clockwise. So that the 2nd corner carved is the one that was carved 1st on the very first tick. On this last tick the errors are seen on the same corners as the first one, but are the corners that are carved 1st, 3rd (and last it finishes where it started) are where the error is seen.
Last edit: 12 years 9 months ago by Todd Zuercher.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
12 years 9 months ago #42559
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
is there a chance we could play with your configs?
sam
sam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4793
- Thank you received: 1480
12 years 9 months ago #42560
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Maybe. What would you like me to mess with? Would you like me to post my config?
I might have a stepper machine I could play with some as well. It's Z and W axis are fixed at a close spacing, so we don't use it for double carving. We use it more like a 2 postion tool changer.
I might have a stepper machine I could play with some as well. It's Z and W axis are fixed at a close spacing, so we don't use it for double carving. We use it more like a 2 postion tool changer.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rellenberg
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 10
12 years 9 months ago #42568
by rellenberg
Replied by rellenberg on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Hi Todd,
Thanks for running this test for us! It would help debugging if I could run your config in simulation. Looking at the the position log of both Z and W should reveal any issues.
Another question on a hunch: is the servo control done on dedicated hardware?
-Rob
Thanks for running this test for us! It would help debugging if I could run your config in simulation. Looking at the the position log of both Z and W should reveal any issues.
Another question on a hunch: is the servo control done on dedicated hardware?
-Rob
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4793
- Thank you received: 1480
12 years 9 months ago #42570
by Todd Zuercher
Replied by Todd Zuercher on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Here is my config.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.310 seconds