- Posts: 232
- Thank you received: 4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JohnW wrote: What sort of angular positioning accuracy are the original (Toshiba?) resolvers likely to achieve?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
that is to achieve the desired feedrates without incurring whip of the ballscrews.JohnW wrote: I still have the motors. They need a good clean but turn smoothly (ie bearings are OK at least). X and Y are 100w 3.25kg/cm servo motors, Z is 200w 6.5kg/cm according to the original sales brochures for the machine. One thing I have noticed is that the ball spindle pitch on the machine seems more coarse that I would have expected.
Well, my resolver converters get 4096 quadrature counts/rev, but they might have had a higher res converter originally.It all looks standard, and I wondered how they manage to meet the original precision spec of 0.01mm. What sort of angular positioning accuracy are the original (Toshiba?) resolvers likely to achieve?
At least with LinuxCNC, the Z axis syncs to the spindle rotation, so it doesn't need a precise spindle control. But, there is a video of one of these machines doing tapping, and the spindle is reversing REALLY rapidly to do a peck tapping cycle.Yes, the Z axis is quite heavy! It has the original a 1.5KW servo spindle motor on it. I was thinking of a counter weight if I converted the machine to manual only.
With regard to side loads, I was more concerned with the actual vertical ways not being rigid enough for milling, or getting damaged from side loads. From pictures on the web the spindle tube appears about 6 or 7 inches long, with 4 ball bearing races, two at each end... The spec says the spindle motor is a 1.5KW Servo motor. Is it a servo because for the tapping operations, you need to synchronise the exact number of rotations with plunge depth for thread cutting?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Was this because the side forces from milling were rotating the servo motors? Adding a brake is no good if you want to mill a circle or curve, with X and Y smoothly changing. I wonder was that some sort of motor drive issue that could be corrected? Or is it these Toshiba servo motors by nature of their design (assuming you have the standard motors)?mblaszkiewicz wrote: I found milling on my machine has to be extremely light. I actually had the table move pit of the way on a.030 side cuti cut .250 deep in aluminum with a .375 carbide endmill. I think the table is set up like a Jig bore. Precise positioning but very little side loading support
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
mblaszkiewicz wrote: No it was actually the table lifting and moving. The machine was designed as a high speed drill tap. All forces down.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.