Starting over
- Patrick Obrien
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 0
14 Nov 2016 12:36 #82768
by Patrick Obrien
I took the safe route and bought the hard drive with 2.8 preinstalled to eliminate at least one potential configuration goof up.
To my eye the HAL doesn't appear to have 2.8 features for the gantry.
If I an interpreting the 2.8 documentation correctly, neither my HAL nor my INI appear to take advantage of the 2.8 joints_axes structure. Is there a argument I need for pncconf?
Replied by Patrick Obrien on topic Starting over
You might want to consider switching to version 2.8 (not that Pncconf can do the tandem limit switch there either) but some elements of a gantry configuration are much simpler there.
I took the safe route and bought the hard drive with 2.8 preinstalled to eliminate at least one potential configuration goof up.
To my eye the HAL doesn't appear to have 2.8 features for the gantry.
(If you scan through the changes you might get some feel for how much better-suited for a gantry it now is)
linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/getting-sta..._configuration_files
If I an interpreting the 2.8 documentation correctly, neither my HAL nor my INI appear to take advantage of the 2.8 joints_axes structure. Is there a argument I need for pncconf?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 Nov 2016 12:47 #82769
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Starting over
it may be that your particular 2.8 is from before the merge of JA.
Does the Synaptic package manager "see" LinuxCNC?
Does the Synaptic package manager "see" LinuxCNC?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patrick Obrien
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 33
- Thank you received: 0
14 Nov 2016 13:31 #82772
by Patrick Obrien
Replied by Patrick Obrien on topic Starting over
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 Nov 2016 13:44 #82773
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Starting over
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.162 seconds