LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 153
- Thank you received: 249
14 Feb 2026 20:25 #342963
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
if you don't touch the feed override, the errors can still come up?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- endian
-
- Away
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 302
- Thank you received: 114
14 Feb 2026 22:01 #342965
by endian
crashes are not present during the 100% feed just if its not 100% ...
crash log is in the attachement if somebody are interested ...
Replied by endian on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
I have noticed the slowing during the round movement too but I forgot to noticed it here.... yes it is present and its present during 100% feed value ...New PR from YangYang is ready, hopefully will be merged soon in master
This adds ruckig in the planner type 1
if you want to test it get the binary from
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/actions/runs/21975584400
or build source from my repo
github.com/grandixximo/linuxcnc
Testers are welcome to report here or in github, thanks!
Hello gentlemen,
movement are incredible smooth ... basic shaping what I have tested till now is pretty ... but during movement at more points during simulation of rotation interpolation its jumping or woobing ... kind off braking and next accelleration
most spiking during cloud of points are gone ... some spiking are still present but it a huuuuge step forward
testing setup 2ms benchtop profibus master 3axis geany gui ... 3 servo axis with synchronized speed control loop at 2ms
some testing fault popups triggered during the movement of file 3_1001.ngc
I am still testing at default simulation file from past but splitted to separated operations ..
thanks a lot for your progress ... I am watching it every single day with mount open and box of popcorn to reading the edits ...
regards E.
crashes are not present during the 100% feed just if its not 100% ...
crash log is in the attachement if somebody are interested ...
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo, Darium
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 153
- Thank you received: 249
15 Feb 2026 01:45 #342972
by grandixximo
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
I will have YangYang take a look after the holidays, thank you for testing.
We are on a Chinese new year brake for a couple of weeks.
I'm still working on Planner Type 2, will see what YangYang thinks after the holidays, hopefully Rob will also do some testing
We are on a Chinese new year brake for a couple of weeks.
I'm still working on Planner Type 2, will see what YangYang thinks after the holidays, hopefully Rob will also do some testing
The following user(s) said Thank You: endian, Darium, NWE
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- endian
-
- Away
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 302
- Thank you received: 114
15 Feb 2026 09:14 - 15 Feb 2026 13:07 #342989
by endian
Replied by endian on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
hello,
During todays testing Ive noticed time spiking during the G64 P0.005 and less ... I know there is a huge tolerance limit but I am reporting it for full testing approach ... code 1_1001.ngc from .tar file - again simulation or circural interpolation by cloud of point
otherwise timing get huge improve ... no big spikes and no big spikes of accelleration during the movement too!!!
I wish happy new year to China! Take a rest and we will see us after !
thanks
During todays testing Ive noticed time spiking during the G64 P0.005 and less ... I know there is a huge tolerance limit but I am reporting it for full testing approach ... code 1_1001.ngc from .tar file - again simulation or circural interpolation by cloud of point
otherwise timing get huge improve ... no big spikes and no big spikes of accelleration during the movement too!!!
I wish happy new year to China! Take a rest and we will see us after !
thanks
Last edit: 15 Feb 2026 13:07 by endian. Reason: Editor messing
The following user(s) said Thank You: grandixximo, Becksvill
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Becksvill
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 198
- Thank you received: 96
11 Mar 2026 20:34 #344154
by Becksvill
Replied by Becksvill on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
hey guys
just wondering whats the latest on this.
cheers
andrew
just wondering whats the latest on this.
cheers
andrew
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- grandixximo
-
Topic Author
- Away
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 153
- Thank you received: 249
12 Mar 2026 01:54 - 12 Mar 2026 02:01 #344164
by grandixximo
Still work in progress
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/3807
you can read above, if anyone wants to test what's done so far, they can download the debs from github build artifacts
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/actions/runs/22982518117?pr=3807
the above is today's build, scroll to the end of the page for the debs for the different systems, I think I got it to the point where it is in a good enough state for sim testing by the community
To test it set planner type 2, I have included a zip file in this post with my testing settings for planner type 2.
YangYang is refactoring the code, he put planner type 1 on pause because there are certain limitations with TP1 implementation, he cannot reach high speed on short segments.
TP2 will be the general base idea, but much needs to be refactored, the feed override needs to be reworked, kinematics TP and RT servo-thread need to be reworked, there is talk in the github about this, any extra mind is appreciated.
At the moment TP2 generally works, what's still missing from my implementation is spindle sync, I never tested probing or adaptive-feed.
as far as running gcodes and MDI, I believe everything works, but it is far from hardened, it is just me doing testing in a sim, if you put it on your machine, it is at your own risk, play with it in the sim, and let me know how it goes, here, in the gihub PR, or even on my github fork.
Replied by grandixximo on topic LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
hey guys
just wondering whats the latest on this.
cheers
andrew
Still work in progress
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/3807
you can read above, if anyone wants to test what's done so far, they can download the debs from github build artifacts
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/actions/runs/22982518117?pr=3807
the above is today's build, scroll to the end of the page for the debs for the different systems, I think I got it to the point where it is in a good enough state for sim testing by the community
To test it set planner type 2, I have included a zip file in this post with my testing settings for planner type 2.
YangYang is refactoring the code, he put planner type 1 on pause because there are certain limitations with TP1 implementation, he cannot reach high speed on short segments.
TP2 will be the general base idea, but much needs to be refactored, the feed override needs to be reworked, kinematics TP and RT servo-thread need to be reworked, there is talk in the github about this, any extra mind is appreciated.
At the moment TP2 generally works, what's still missing from my implementation is spindle sync, I never tested probing or adaptive-feed.
as far as running gcodes and MDI, I believe everything works, but it is far from hardened, it is just me doing testing in a sim, if you put it on your machine, it is at your own risk, play with it in the sim, and let me know how it goes, here, in the gihub PR, or even on my github fork.
Last edit: 12 Mar 2026 02:01 by grandixximo.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, yrsiddhapura
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.109 seconds