linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
- PCW
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 17973
- Thank you received: 4830
26 Oct 2021 22:12 #224432
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
Can you post the result of running this command:
ip a
Thanks!
ip a
Thanks!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- luap
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 17
- Thank you received: 1
02 Nov 2021 10:55 #224973
by luap
Replied by luap on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
Hallo
i thaught i had it attached in an .pdf. I hop now it will work.
Thank you very much fore help me.
i thaught i had it attached in an .pdf. I hop now it will work.
Thank you very much fore help me.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- luap
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 17
- Thank you received: 1
02 Nov 2021 10:58 #224975
by luap
Replied by luap on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
Hello agin it is not attached itry to insert:
uhu@uhu:~$ ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 38:d5:47:16:f9:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.10.10.11/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global noprefixroute enp1s0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::2265:82f9:7b9c:c6d0/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
uhu@uhu:~$
i hop you will find the problem thank you very much
uhu@uhu:~$ ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp1s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 38:d5:47:16:f9:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.10.10.11/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global noprefixroute enp1s0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::2265:82f9:7b9c:c6d0/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
uhu@uhu:~$
i hop you will find the problem thank you very much
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 17973
- Thank you received: 4830
02 Nov 2021 13:17 - 02 Nov 2021 14:23 #224985
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
I don't think a /8 netmask will work, you should use /24
(netmask 255.255.255.0)
(netmask 255.255.255.0)
Last edit: 02 Nov 2021 14:23 by PCW.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19482
- Thank you received: 6533
02 Nov 2021 14:18 #224990
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
Ip range 10.n.n.n uses /8 netmask normally, can be set to /16 or/24 to isolate intra networks.
But the netmasks are in the following format:
255.0.0.0 = /8
255.255.0.0 = /16
255.255.255.0 = /24
While broadcasts are:
10.255.255.255
10.10.255.255
10.10.10.255
But the netmasks are in the following format:
255.0.0.0 = /8
255.255.0.0 = /16
255.255.255.0 = /24
While broadcasts are:
10.255.255.255
10.10.255.255
10.10.10.255
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19482
- Thank you received: 6533
02 Nov 2021 14:22 #224992
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 17973
- Thank you received: 4830
02 Nov 2021 14:28 #224993
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
Fixed the netmask in my reply
but still think /24 netmask is needed
(Need to check the 7I92s netmask logic)
but still think /24 netmask is needed
(Need to check the 7I92s netmask logic)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19482
- Thank you received: 6533
02 Nov 2021 14:37 #224995
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
If it helps, almost all my machines use 7i92 and all use the /8 netmask, never had a single issue.
Even the big Hurco uses 7i92 and same IP setup.
Oh goodie, found a PDF :
nsrc.org/workshops/2009/summer/presentat.../day3/subnetting.pdf
Even the big Hurco uses 7i92 and same IP setup.
Oh goodie, found a PDF :
nsrc.org/workshops/2009/summer/presentat.../day3/subnetting.pdf
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PCW
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 17973
- Thank you received: 4830
02 Nov 2021 14:42 #224996
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
At some point the 7I92s netmask got changed from fixed
to EEPROM based. I need to check what this is set to.
OP:
Is the situation still the same? That is, what does:
mesaflash --device 7i92 --addr 10.10.10.10 --readhmid
report?
to EEPROM based. I need to check what this is set to.
OP:
Is the situation still the same? That is, what does:
mesaflash --device 7i92 --addr 10.10.10.10 --readhmid
report?
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bevins
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 1937
- Thank you received: 335
02 Nov 2021 14:47 - 02 Nov 2021 14:49 #224997
by bevins
Replied by bevins on topic linuxcnc 2.8.2 no nm connection edit
I always use an 8 bit mask now with a 10.0.0.0 network, but I do remember having issues with one of the mesa cards and when I set it to a 24 bit mask it worked.
/edit subnetting makes my head hurt so I don't do it anymore....lol
/edit subnetting makes my head hurt so I don't do it anymore....lol
Last edit: 02 Nov 2021 14:49 by bevins.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.088 seconds