QTPlasmaC with six axis
- mariusl
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Now the testing starts.
Thanks a lot for your help so far Phill. It is looking good so far and I am excited to see if we can get a full 6 axis machine to run.
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mariusl
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 5723
- Thank you received: 2095
You may do better asking about that in another section of the forum.
We could add a means to switch between joint and world modes.
Although without a lot of work the jog buttons would still have the axes graphics.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 4287
- Thank you received: 1900
For non trivial kinematics proper limit checking at load time is not possible because the planner is totally ignorant of custom kinematics. Your best option would be to check for limit violations in cam or running your gcode in a simulation configuration. Depending on your kinematic you may even have to loosen your axes limits to be able to reach the full work space.I would think that both should be checked when the code is loaded.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mariusl
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
That would help a lot. I dont think it's a train smash if the buttons are not changed at this time. Or at at all for that matter.We could add a means to switch between joint and world modes.
Although without a lot of work the jog buttons would still have the axes graphics.
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mariusl
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
What is weird though is that in the simulation I don't run into the same issues. I don't know if limits are handled at all in simulation but it seems to be not the same.
I would think that both should be checked when the code is loaded.
For non trivial kinematics proper limit checking at load time is not possible because the planner is totally ignorant of custom kinematics. Your best option would be to check for limit violations in cam or running your gcode in a simulation configuration. Depending on your kinematic you may even have to loosen your axes limits to be able to reach the full work space.
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Aciera
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 4287
- Thank you received: 1900
Hm, I don't see how that would differ in a simulation as the joint position commands are not dependent on whether real hardware is connected or not. As long as the limit value settings are identical in both configs. Are you sure you are getting soft limit errors with the machine and not hardware limits? That would of course require that you actually have hardware limit sensors on your machine, which I don't know.I don't know if limits are handled at all in simulation but it seems to be not the same.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mariusl
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mariusl
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Regards
Marius
www.bluearccnc.com
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 5723
- Thank you received: 2095
My thinking on a button was either:
- Convert the "JOGGING" label to a button and make it require a long press.
- A custom user button.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.