Advanced Search

in my mind AndyPugh done a component for these pourpouse ....think you means split an output to multiple of same type right? in hal normally these is not admit .... there are logical comp for these pourpouse ... but you write less code and more redable one if use logicladder ....

plase use "search" action on top right ... insert AX5000 et voilà .... easy!! But admit me too sometime need a suggestion for these ....

sorry why you set step motor but use 1600 register? ..... maybe is because I'm never try but not sure it can work.

Any how go to terminal and digit: /usr/bin/linuxcnc '/"your-home folder"/"your user-folder"/"your-linuxcnc-folder"/configs/"your-name-config-folder"/"your-ini-file".ini' ... so you can see all error and warning and you can share here for some helps ....

Aciera post=306528 userid=25994Not sure I understand the question right but you can connect multiple hal inputs to the same signal:
 

to give some perspective of why this question has been asked is this, when I was trying to get my 7i96 to use a
general output pin to not only turn on the #5 SSR pin ON but also use PWM to control the hotwire for Foam cutting.
I was also using pyvcp to show what power the wire was running at and that it was ON. However when I did the HAL
and tried to connect that to pyvcp I kept getting an error saying the spindle-enable signal was already connected to
somewhere else, I can't remember where. If I could have split that signal I could
have achieved what I was doing.
   Instead I used the spindle-cw signal to achieve showing the hotwire was ON in pyvcp. It works, But I am still
trying to figure a way to split the original signal so it could have gone to were ever it originally went and send to where
I wanted it to go as well without involving Classic Ladder.

O M G. Wait, are you showing us that all what's missing to RIO to be fully functional is a fpga dev board and the toolchain installed? As in "screw Gowin IDE'??? If that's the case then that's a pretty serious game changer.

I have so much to learn about your solution, obviously. Excitement is getting outta control!!

it does deserve a reply.

Ok, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt.

So to start with some basics:
- your 'hal.ini' is not an '.ini' format but a '.hal' format.
- your 'config' would be called a 'hal component'

Whether PP is going to be fast enough will mostly depend on what kind of use you have in mind for the DAC.

Now before you make a PCB you may want to try and get that hal component of yours compiled and installed (prepend 'sudo' if you are on a package install):
halcompile --install <path/your_component.comp>

Once that hurdle is overcome you can then create a simulation config to test your custom component and your .hal file.
You can use the 'halscope' tool to check the output of your custom component:
linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/hal/tutoria...ec:tutorial-halscope

To get an idea of how a custom component file is structured see the components included in the source code:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/tree/master/src/hal/components

[edit]
Please keep in mind that presenting a ChatGPT spit out on a technical forum like this will most likely make you look like somebody who doesn't want to spend any time learning the basics. I know it may look like a good start to somebody who has no clue but to people who know just a little bit more it just simply looks like a serious lack of effort.

Just an example from a normal servo config, where x-pos-fb is just an arbitrary name and is wired to 3 other pins, or all 3 pins are wired together to the bus bar, and the bus bar is named x-pos-fb

Not sure I understand the question right but you can connect multiple hal inputs to the same signal:

net signal <= hal.pin-out => hal.pin-in1 => hal.pin-in2 ...

 I have been reading through the Manual looking for a way to turn one signal into multiple signals.
I know it's possible in Classic Ladder, but is it possible to do it in HAL? Like AND 2 but in reverse.
(1in 2out)? Basically I want to make a signal splitter.

Sorry to bother but is there an ETA on the 2.9.3? 
and will the game pad key mapping be included? ex: github.com/AntiMicroX/antimicrox?tab=readme-ov-file

Oh how cool is that. Yeah definitely wire them into the three surplus encoder inputs on the 7i97.

Would be very cool if you could connect that Heidenhain control panel into LinuxCNC as well. Do you have info about it? Is it a matrix keyboard?

A stuck output means a damaged driver chip.

Driver chips can be damaged by:

1. Excessive supply voltage (can the field voltage surge above 32V?)

2. Inductive loads > ~60 ma if they do no have a flyback diode
(flyback diodes are recommended in all cases)

The chip can be replaced by returning the 7I77 to Mesa

That looks like IRQ coalescing is not disabled.
You should get ping times about 1/2 your current values.
(the first ping can be ignored because it includes a ARP request)

what does

ip a

report?
 

Personally, i do not mind such questions at all, the OP has given us some info to chew on, so no matter what question, it does deserve a reply.
-
To answer the question from the tittle:
Yes, parallel port is fast enough for a lot of things/machines/whatever as long as you consider the requirements in regards to port limitations.
I have Plasma, Mill, engravers, Styrofoam cutters, all using parallel port for over 10 years without a single issue, ever.
And at one point in time i used a parallel port with LinuxCNC and the included scope as an Oscilloscope/Logic Analyzer, just mind the 5V input limit.

I'm sorry, I was a bit bored

 

riocore/configs/MecanixDev/config-test.json
riocore/boards/MecanixDev/board.json