PathPilot V2 source code
- ihavenofish
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 708
- Thank you received: 137
25 Dec 2024 11:58 #317344
by ihavenofish
Replied by ihavenofish on topic PathPilot V2 source code
if its not the lastest one for the 1500mx, it is not the one we are talking about. keep that in mind. the older one is the same tp as is already in linuxcnc.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tivoi
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2396
- Thank you received: 783
27 Dec 2024 17:57 #317490
by snowgoer540
I think it might make the most sense to just port the >3 axis look ahead and blending over to the master LCNC branch.
I am not sure how their TP differs from ours otherwise, but I do know that theirs is pretty well tested and stable at this point.
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Snowgoeroe,
For my clarity.
You want pathpilot planner running in lcnc?
I think it might make the most sense to just port the >3 axis look ahead and blending over to the master LCNC branch.
I am not sure how their TP differs from ours otherwise, but I do know that theirs is pretty well tested and stable at this point.
The following user(s) said Thank You: RDA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Grotius
- Away
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2244
- Thank you received: 1959
27 Dec 2024 18:12 #317493
by Grotius
Replied by Grotius on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Hi,
I have version V2.10.1 here.
The tp.c file is last modified :17-05-2024 19:40
I have version V2.10.1 here.
The tp.c file is last modified :17-05-2024 19:40
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ihavenofish
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 708
- Thank you received: 137
27 Dec 2024 19:10 - 27 Dec 2024 19:56 #317500
by ihavenofish
Replied by ihavenofish on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Nope, wrong one, that's basically the same one as the regular linuxcnc one. new one is not available yet I don't think.
Last edit: 27 Dec 2024 19:56 by ihavenofish.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Grotius
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Grotius
- Away
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2244
- Thank you received: 1959
27 Dec 2024 22:59 #317514
by Grotius
Replied by Grotius on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Ok,
Now, to cheer you all up, i just put here some movies i made tonight.
Now, to cheer you all up, i just put here some movies i made tonight.
The following user(s) said Thank You: RDA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ihavenofish
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 708
- Thank you received: 137
27 Dec 2024 23:40 #317517
by ihavenofish
Replied by ihavenofish on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Which one is that?
The following user(s) said Thank You: Grotius
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Grotius
- Away
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2244
- Thank you received: 1959
27 Dec 2024 23:59 #317519
by Grotius
Replied by Grotius on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Is also on linuxcnc. But then in development. Just to cheer you up.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ihavenofish
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 708
- Thank you received: 137
28 Dec 2024 01:18 #317527
by ihavenofish
Replied by ihavenofish on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Ah thats yours. thought it was the tormach
Looks nice so far.
Looks nice so far.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2396
- Thank you received: 783
28 Dec 2024 03:09 - 28 Dec 2024 03:11 #317533
by snowgoer540
For the record, I’m not talking about their new changes for the 1500MX which has their “high speed machining”. I’m talking about >3 axis look ahead with blended motion.
Not sure what they changed back in May, could be as simple as a comment or a bug fix. Either way, their 3+ axis look ahead has been part of “PathPilot”’for quite some time. That’s what I was referring to as being tested in the wild for years.
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Hi,
I have version V2.10.1 here.
The tp.c file is last modified :17-05-2024 19:40
For the record, I’m not talking about their new changes for the 1500MX which has their “high speed machining”. I’m talking about >3 axis look ahead with blended motion.
Not sure what they changed back in May, could be as simple as a comment or a bug fix. Either way, their 3+ axis look ahead has been part of “PathPilot”’for quite some time. That’s what I was referring to as being tested in the wild for years.
Last edit: 28 Dec 2024 03:11 by snowgoer540.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ihavenofish
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 708
- Thank you received: 137
28 Dec 2024 05:25 - 28 Dec 2024 05:26 #317535
by ihavenofish
Hmmm. I am talking about the jerk control feature myself. I thought that came in specifically with the 1500.
For me there's not much point in a new TP without jerk control. The look ahead and path smoothing works fine enough that the next stumbling block is jerk, and not path smoothing.
Replied by ihavenofish on topic PathPilot V2 source code
Hi,
I have version V2.10.1 here.
The tp.c file is last modified :17-05-2024 19:40
For the record, I’m not talking about their new changes for the 1500MX which has their “high speed machining”. I’m talking about >3 axis look ahead with blended motion.
Not sure what they changed back in May, could be as simple as a comment or a bug fix. Either way, their 3+ axis look ahead has been part of “PathPilot”’for quite some time. That’s what I was referring to as being tested in the wild for years.
Hmmm. I am talking about the jerk control feature myself. I thought that came in specifically with the 1500.
For me there's not much point in a new TP without jerk control. The look ahead and path smoothing works fine enough that the next stumbling block is jerk, and not path smoothing.
Last edit: 28 Dec 2024 05:26 by ihavenofish.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.081 seconds