- Posts: 1947
- Thank you received: 338
Another plasma component...
- bevins
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
rodw wrote:
bevins wrote:
rodw wrote: Hmm, why don't we just increase the number of tools to 257 like this and just do it all in the .mat file?
www.wiki.eusurplus.com/index.php?title=U...257_instead_of_56.29 ?
Why is this not done by default? 257 tools.
It is .... by Path Pilot.....
I checked the sources and it has not changed.,
Who do I have to send money to to get this done in the next release? lol
Think it would be possible to have this as a config option in the ini?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Dee436
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 91
- Thank you received: 13
I wanted to check probing, but when I go into the plasma config tab or the plasma run tab I am unable to enter any setting, the spin buttons do not work and any numbers that I can type in manually just revert to 0 or blank when I move to the next box or try to save.
I also notice that the squares gcode file does not load at start up. I also still have to comment out the IHS skip or I get an error, see attached screenshot.
I feel as though I have a path wrong or some files missing. I have tried a new clone and copy of the files to my Plasmac directory but it was still the same. I also used to have a test window pop up that I no longer see.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BigJohnT
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 3981
- Thank you received: 994
rodw wrote: Hmm, why don't we just increase the number of tools to 257 like this and just do it all in the .mat file?
www.wiki.eusurplus.com/index.php?title=U...257_instead_of_56.29 ?
Rod, that's a good find... wonder why it's not done in master?
Someone needs to do a PR on that, I can't quite figure out how to start one, I know how to merge one lol.
JT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 12170
- Thank you received: 4153
BigJohnT wrote:
rodw wrote: Someone needs to do a PR on that, I can't quite figure out how to start one, I know how to merge one lol.
JT
I was kinda hoping if Phill implemented it in his repository, it would find its way into master branch eventually!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BigJohnT
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 3981
- Thank you received: 994
rodw wrote:
BigJohnT wrote:
rodw wrote: Someone needs to do a PR on that, I can't quite figure out how to start one, I know how to merge one lol.
JT
I was kinda hoping if Phill implemented it in his repository, it would find its way into master branch eventually!
Andy mentioned on the IRC that doing that is a huge increase in the NML memory, so I'm assuming that is the reason it has not be done. He also mentioned that he thought Rene was working on the tool table. And that a limit is silly because changing tools breaks blending anyway so motion only needs one tool... which would mean an unlimited amount of tools in the tool table. I wish my C and C++ was as good as my Python.
JT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 5711
- Thank you received: 2100
Thank you, what are the following?
Pause at end of cut=0.5
Wiggle length=9.999979999999999
DTHC delay -sec=1
NO DTHC - 0=1
Cheers, Phill.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.