GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
24 Jan 2021 21:59 #196473
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
It is interesting that this talk about button placement came up now. When PlasmaC was first released it had its own GUI that was designed along those lines, there was a row of buttons across the top that followed the work flow. No one was interested so I abandoned it.
QtPlasmaC is not specifically designed for a touch screen. I don't have one and have never considered using one on a machine. The intent is for it to be touch screen friendly.
QtPlasmaC is not specifically designed for a touch screen. I don't have one and have never considered using one on a machine. The intent is for it to be touch screen friendly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
24 Jan 2021 23:06 #196481
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
I must say I don't remember it. but I think the the real issue was that the Axis and Gmocappy (which I've always used) support touch screens poorly. Even when Gmocappy was touted as being touch screen friendly there are a few areas where elements are too small to select with your finger so I always had a keyboard handy. Gmocappy is actually the worst offender I think. Too much selecting tabs so it becomes more like estop, power on, swap tab, select home, then home all. Then jog to your position, select the tab for my laser macro, then swap tabs again to load a file, then you are finally right to go.
The estop and power and the home buttons are in diagonally opposite corners which made me curse the touch screen. A mouse was much faster.
So I think QTPlasmac is pretty good as it is, but because Pedro raised it, I also added my feedback becasue from my Gmocappy experience, this was pretty important and I had spent some time reviewing the ergonomics which are much better on a small (15.7" screen) than Gmocappy. I decided that I could live with it so did not raise it earlier.
I can see Pedro's logic about using the Z axis jog buttons. But to me its not a show stopper.
Until I build my HMI, I am not yet in a position to experiment. I think auto power on would be a good feature if you have an external estop beside the GUI.
The area I would like to look at moving forward is controlling the 3 sliders with an MPG. If I can figure it out, I have 3 spare MPG selections on my 6 axis pendant but ultimately, they could move to the HMI enclosure as individual controls. I was hoping that by using a MPG, the touch screen reset to defaults buttons could still be used.
The estop and power and the home buttons are in diagonally opposite corners which made me curse the touch screen. A mouse was much faster.
So I think QTPlasmac is pretty good as it is, but because Pedro raised it, I also added my feedback becasue from my Gmocappy experience, this was pretty important and I had spent some time reviewing the ergonomics which are much better on a small (15.7" screen) than Gmocappy. I decided that I could live with it so did not raise it earlier.
I can see Pedro's logic about using the Z axis jog buttons. But to me its not a show stopper.
Until I build my HMI, I am not yet in a position to experiment. I think auto power on would be a good feature if you have an external estop beside the GUI.
The area I would like to look at moving forward is controlling the 3 sliders with an MPG. If I can figure it out, I have 3 spare MPG selections on my 6 axis pendant but ultimately, they could move to the HMI enclosure as individual controls. I was hoping that by using a MPG, the touch screen reset to defaults buttons could still be used.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6432
24 Jan 2021 23:09 #196482
by tommylight
I am sure that at the very least i clicked on thank you, due to usually being unable to reply so the least i can do is click.
If i did not, shame on me !
Replied by tommylight on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Just spent 15 minutes looking for it. It had roughly 8 to 10 buttons and pretty much empty otherwise.When PlasmaC was first released it had its own GUI that was designed along those lines, there was a row of buttons across the top that followed the work flow. No one was interested so I abandoned it.
I am sure that at the very least i clicked on thank you, due to usually being unable to reply so the least i can do is click.
If i did not, shame on me !
The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
24 Jan 2021 23:17 #196484
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
You most probably did click "Thank You" Tom, my poor wording... what I meant was that AFAIK no one used it.
Just spent 15 minutes looking for it. It had roughly 8 to 10 buttons and pretty much empty otherwise.When PlasmaC was first released it had its own GUI that was designed along those lines, there was a row of buttons across the top that followed the work flow. No one was interested so I abandoned it.
I am sure that at the very least i clicked on thank you, due to usually being unable to reply so the least i can do is click.
If i did not, shame on me !
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6432
24 Jan 2021 23:43 #196487
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
I wish i did, but as it happens a lot i am busy and have to have a priorities list, and some of the stuff from that list has to go down a bit, then something changes like you posting a new look ( GUI, not you ) or KCJ posting a mildly working GUI or me using Axis PlasmaC daily, then some stuff that was lower on that list falls off despite me trying to push 18 to 22 hour work days.
One thing that is consistent in my posts whenever feature requests are made, is the time Phill has to invest to bring those features to life and the subsequent time invested to support those features, or in some cases go back and change an ill advised feature.
-
Let's agree on this:
-anyone requesting any new feature or a change to existing features should successfully change the size of the jog arrows in at least one of the 3 included QTPlasmaC GUI's !
It took me half an hour, i made a mess, but i did figure out and changed the size of everything i needed, just not as elegantly as Phill did, but now i know i can do it properly in an hour or two.
NEXT.....
One thing that is consistent in my posts whenever feature requests are made, is the time Phill has to invest to bring those features to life and the subsequent time invested to support those features, or in some cases go back and change an ill advised feature.
-
Let's agree on this:
-anyone requesting any new feature or a change to existing features should successfully change the size of the jog arrows in at least one of the 3 included QTPlasmaC GUI's !
It took me half an hour, i made a mess, but i did figure out and changed the size of everything i needed, just not as elegantly as Phill did, but now i know i can do it properly in an hour or two.
NEXT.....
The following user(s) said Thank You: phillc54
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
24 Jan 2021 23:48 #196488
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Haha, it probably took me that long the first time as well, it has been a steep learning curve. Are you running your modified GUI directly from your config folder.It took me half an hour, i made a mess, but i did figure out and changed the size of everything i needed, just not as elegantly as Phill did, but now i know i can do it properly in an hour or two.
NEXT.....
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6432
25 Jan 2021 00:27 #196495
by tommylight
Strange thing, i did manage to run my big machine with it after about 5 minutes of messing with hal and ini files, i could not get this (by this i mean the other HP PC to the left of me) to work for over an hour ! I have to fix that .....
Replied by tommylight on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Yes, from the existing sim folder !Are you running your modified GUI directly from your config folder.
Strange thing, i did manage to run my big machine with it after about 5 minutes of messing with hal and ini files, i could not get this (by this i mean the other HP PC to the left of me) to work for over an hour ! I have to fix that .....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6432
25 Jan 2021 00:29 #196497
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Oh you mean the UI file !
I edit it somewhere else, save, copy to where it resides, double click on the desktop, all with one swoop of the hand as i used 2 monitors to edit.
I edit it somewhere else, save, copy to where it resides, double click on the desktop, all with one swoop of the hand as i used 2 monitors to edit.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jan 2021 00:30 #196498
by phillc54
I haven't tried that yet but I do believe that if you do it that way then it won't get overwritten by updates and QtVCP will load the one from the config folder rather than the system one. If that is the case then it does make for easier customisation.
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Yes, from the existing sim folder !Are you running your modified GUI directly from your config folder.
Strange thing, i did manage to run my big machine with it after about 5 minutes of messing with hal and ini files, i could not get this (by this i mean the other HP PC to the left of me) to work for over an hour ! I have to fix that .....
I haven't tried that yet but I do believe that if you do it that way then it won't get overwritten by updates and QtVCP will load the one from the config folder rather than the system one. If that is the case then it does make for easier customisation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jan 2021 11:49 #196523
by rodw
Replied by rodw on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Still very early days yet but I have a HMI enclosure for Plasmac as of 5:30 pm today!
The circuit board for my 7i73/Odroid/Estop/Wireless pendant shield arrived today but I'm still waiting for some components to arrive.
Anyway, I thought I'd post here becasue a brand new GUI deserves a brand new enclosure to live in!
The circuit board for my 7i73/Odroid/Estop/Wireless pendant shield arrived today but I'm still waiting for some components to arrive.
Anyway, I thought I'd post here becasue a brand new GUI deserves a brand new enclosure to live in!
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.172 seconds