- Posts: 5713
- Thank you received: 2100
Feature Request
I was interested to see if it would happen, as it has not been reported before. (that I can remember)snowgoer540 wrote:
Oh, testing me to see if I would notice are you?!phillc54 wrote: That is the same as the X/Y "jiggle", you are jogging back up to the soft limit. I purposely dodn't disable the offsets on Z like I did with X/Y to see if this would appear. I am surprised that it took so long to find. I will do the same with Z, disable offsets unless they are being used.
You get to keep your job. :laugh:What do I win now??
Now I know why I said somewhere in the docs to not jog the Z axis.I may not have noticed had I not accidentally started a probe with the torch lowered. Normally I don't jog the Z axis much after a failure.
It is not a bug, it is the way external offsets works. It is mentioned in the external offsets docs to stay away from the soft limits while offsets are active.Regarding the offset, I think we said this was a bug in the LinuxCNC core? If so, did it ever get reported?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2581
- Thank you received: 907
I do remember trying to get it to happen with the Z axis, but I never could. *shrug* guess I had a stroke of brilliance today? lolphillc54 wrote: I was interested to see if it would happen, as it has not been reported before. (that I can remember)
Sweet! I enjoy it.You get to keep your job. :laugh:
haha, I did say it was an accident :laugh: at least when someone else makes the mistake it wont do a springy maneuver haha.Now I know why I said somewhere in the docs to not jog the Z axis.
It is not a bug, it is the way external offsets works. It is mentioned in the external offsets docs to stay away from the soft limits while offsets are active.[/quote]Regarding the offset, I think we said this was a bug in the LinuxCNC core? If so, did it ever get reported?
OHH, I missed that part. Ok sounds good then. Just making sure.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2581
- Thank you received: 907
phillc54 wrote: All these issues "should" be fixed now in 2.8, master and the test branch.
Thanks Phill, much appreciated as always! I am planning to mess with my THC this evening so I'll report back if something is amiss
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2581
- Thank you received: 907
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.