- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
- rmtucker
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
12 years 6 months ago #45565
by rmtucker
Replied by rmtucker on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
ARC_BLEND_ENABLE = 1 : self-explanatory, disable the new TP method entirely.
Does this statement turn off the new TP and revert back to the old TP?
Does this statement turn off the new TP and revert back to the old TP?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rellenberg
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 37
- Thank you received: 10
12 years 6 months ago #45650
by rellenberg
Replied by rellenberg on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
I'm not sure if this was answered elsewhere, but I'll answer here too in case.
That flag disables circular arc blending and uses parabolic blending for everything (what the stock TP does). In that sense it will revert to the previous behavior. However, due to some major refactoring, you'd still be running modified code. One difference you'll see, for example, is that acceleration on circular arcs is lower in my branch, which fixes a minor acceleration violation in some conditions.
That flag disables circular arc blending and uses parabolic blending for everything (what the stock TP does). In that sense it will revert to the previous behavior. However, due to some major refactoring, you'd still be running modified code. One difference you'll see, for example, is that acceleration on circular arcs is lower in my branch, which fixes a minor acceleration violation in some conditions.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rmtucker
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 6 months ago #45688
by rmtucker
Replied by rmtucker on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Rob
I am not having much success getting this to work on the machinekit/beaglebone setup.
It works no problem in Sim mode
But i will take that up with them.
But what i would like to know is:-
What is the correct usage of G64 in a program to utilize your new TP.
Just G64
or G64 P*.*
or G64 P*.* Q*.*
Maybe you could add the answer into your first post aswell?
I am not having much success getting this to work on the machinekit/beaglebone setup.
It works no problem in Sim mode
But i will take that up with them.
But what i would like to know is:-
What is the correct usage of G64 in a program to utilize your new TP.
Just G64
or G64 P*.*
or G64 P*.* Q*.*
Maybe you could add the answer into your first post aswell?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
12 years 6 months ago #45698
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
nothing has changed with G64 vs the current TP
www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/gcode/gcode.html#sec:G64
So - as a summary.
G64 Go as fast as you can while touching every segment.
G64 Px.xxx - (No Q assumes Q = P) Combine line segments that are within x.xxx and follow new path within x.xxx
G64 Px.xxx Qy.yyy Combine segments that are within y.yyy - follow new path within x.xxx
G64 Qy.yyy combine segments within y.yyy and go as fast as you can while still touching each segment in the new path.
Clear as mud?
sam
www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/gcode/gcode.html#sec:G64
So - as a summary.
G64 Go as fast as you can while touching every segment.
G64 Px.xxx - (No Q assumes Q = P) Combine line segments that are within x.xxx and follow new path within x.xxx
G64 Px.xxx Qy.yyy Combine segments that are within y.yyy - follow new path within x.xxx
G64 Qy.yyy combine segments within y.yyy and go as fast as you can while still touching each segment in the new path.
Clear as mud?
sam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 1240
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 5 months ago - 12 years 5 months ago #46687
by 1240
Replied by 1240 on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
If I use Linux 2.5.4, it take 10 min
If i use new TP, it take 5 min.
I use G64P0.05
I just happy.
If i use new TP, it take 5 min.
I use G64P0.05
I just happy.
Last edit: 12 years 5 months ago by 1240.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skunkworks
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 153
12 years 5 months ago #46690
by skunkworks
Replied by skunkworks on topic New Trajectory Planner - Testers/programs wanted
Yay!!
sam
sam
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.433 seconds