First Time Help
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1441
Now to callibrate everything.
Andy
Thank You
Thank You
THANK YOU
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1441
With the old DOS software, I was able to get this thing truckin along at 800 inches / min.
I am getting folloing errors at around 200 ipm in EMC2.
I don't have to get way up to 800, but I would like to see 400ipm for rapid positioning.
The steps/inch is about 1800 for the Y axis and 1500 for the X (Z is 2000 but it dosn't need to go that fast)
Am I expecting to much from software stepping?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The steps/inch is about 1800 for the Y axis and 1500 for the X (Z is 2000 but it dosn't need to go that fast)
Am I expecting to much from software stepping?
It was software-stepping in the DOS software, so should be able to work at least as well in EMC2.
1800 st/in and 800 in/min = 24000 st/sec = 41uS per step.
What do you have for base thread rate and stepgen max vel?
If EMC2 is reporting following errors it means that either the base thread is too slow to keep up or that the stepgen rate is maxing out. There is no actual feedback.
Can you attach your HAL and INI files?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1441
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1441
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The PCL720 driver doesn't have a "reset" function which the parallel port driver has (which allows a full step every thread, rather than every other thread). It might be possible to add it by simply copying the method used in hal_parport. That would double the possible step rate.
However, it might be simplest to tweak the drives. At 1500 step/in you have an accuracy of under 1/1000", which seems excessive for a router and probably rather exceeds the stiffness of the machine. You can probably adjust the servo drives to a smaller number of pulses per rev.
If the drives can accept a quadrature input (which EMC2 can happily generate) then that would double the step rate too.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1441
I 've set up M111 and M112 to turn vacuum on and off.
I'll post some pictures of the machine when I get home tonight.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
You will probably find that actual cuts are faster and smoother, even if the rapids are slower.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Todd Zuercher
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5007
- Thank you received: 1441
Here are a couple of pics of the machine
Now I just need to have someone with a scope (our IT guy has one kicking around) to help me do a better tune of the servos. I have never been real happy with the tune for the Y axis since the machine was new. I tried once by hand, ear, eye but I wasn't real pleased with the results. Here is a pic of some carving that shows the problem.
There is just a little to much wobble for my liking. Problem is it is just to much mass for to small of a motor, on an already marginal drive train.
Sorry I didn't realize I was limited to 1 pic
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.