New and Working RTAI debs for 2.9

rodw wrote:

Life has got more complicated. With proper kernel tuning, latency can be better with Debian 13. I am in the process of publishing a second video about this on YouTube. Please refer to my channel.  www.youtube.com/@MrRodW
The yet to be published video should be watched before the current one.

I watched the videos, and I have some information.
1. Every time I tried to do a clean install, it returned a firmware error rtl_nic/rtl8168h-2.fw, and I believe that because of this firmware error, the Windows boot option did not appear in GRUB. "When I learned about that utility you used, Balena Etcher, to create the installation pendrive, it solved the problem." Rufus with Windows was the cause of not creating the installation media 100%.
2. Some modifications suggested in the video did not have a better effect for me, and I believe it's because of my CPU; with Debian 13, I didn't have any success with PREEMPT_RT.

3. I did a new procedure with RTAI and observed that if I create a machine without spindle controls, I don't have crashes or the segfault error. But another issue arose: the created machine does not communicate with the LPT.

The problem with the RTAI kernels is that they are stuck at v5 and they don't have such good hardware support as the preempt-rt kernels.

It is also possible that there is a problem with the 5.4.290 kernel as mentioned here:
forum.linuxcnc.org/9-installing-linuxcnc...-2-9?start=60#333143

5.4.279 is supposedly better, but I can't find it.

andypugh wrote:

The problem with the RTAI kernels is that they are stuck at v5 and they don't have such good hardware support as the preempt-rt kernels.It is also possible that there is a problem with the 5.4.290 kernel as mentioned here:https://forum.linuxcnc.org/9-installing-linuxcnc/53163-new-and-working-rtai-debs-for-2-9?start=60
 
would that be it?

 

I saved some installation files; I meant to delete them, but because they contained important information, they remained.

cnbbom wrote:

would that be it?1 drive.google.com/file/d/1BwlJet6ZcWpXvAUzD2YcM9vvnPTuclaX/view    2 drive.google.com/file/d/1xICFF-2mq_rz-vi.../view?usp=drive_link 3 drive.google.com/file/d/14Z10IOZI5bvgmf_.../view?usp=drive_link 4 drive.google.com/file/d/1fwGb5Qo9pw8lGLp.../view?usp=drive_link

Possibly, though I would need to apply for access as I can't currently view them. 
 

andypugh wrote:

... I can't currently view them. 
 

+1