Advanced Search

Hi Guys. I have used RIOcore on a Tang Nano 9k (TangBOB board) a couple of times. I am now wanting to try out Ethercat. I was wondering what my options are for doing this. I want to use a RP5 with the Tang connected via an SPI connection to the GPIO pins on the RP5. My first question is where do I connect my Ethercat Drives? from the RP5 or from the Wiznet module connected to the Tang. I would dearly love it if all my configurations for Ethercat can be done within RIOcore.

Cheers
Andrew

Logthor wrote:

 

File Attachment:

File Name: BBU_part_V...sion.zip
File Size:19 KB

My only concern regarding using my parallel port computer with a breakout board is the delay (hence why I was considering the mesa card). Hypothetically, let's say my jitter isn't a problem. Will my experience making chips be the same as with a mesa card? I want to make some pretty complex parts and am concerned that any amount of jitter could make that impossible. I've attached an STL file of a part that I want to make for a friend. Could this be possible using a parallel port, or should I just spring for the more expensive card?
 

The main difference between a parallel port based system and a system with external Step/Dir generation
hardware is the maximum step rate, This speed will be limited by the real time jitter on the parallel port system.

The output hardware does not limit the complexity of the created shapes just the maximum speed.

 

So I should probably start with my Dell first and then get a Mesa card once I feel up to it? Just to confirm, you are saying that you don't think it'll be an issue for making that part (assuming the jitter is not a problem)?

leexi wrote:

Please share your comments and experience.
 

1. This card is not clone. This is original chinese design. 
2. Never upload any firmware. The proper firmware is loaded by manufacturer.
3 You have to do "mesaflash --device 7i92 --addr 10.10.10.10  --readhmid". This shows card configuration.
4. There is in your hal file line like "loadrt hm2_eth board_ip="10.10.10.10" config="num_encoders=1 num_pwmgens=3 num_stepgens=5"". Functions ommited in this line are unavailable, but you can use it's pins as regular I/O. Of course you are limited by card design. If manufacturer designed some pin as output you cannot use this as input (and vice versa) because output circuit is one way.
5. As mentioned above dkms driver may help. Also other version of kernel may help. The "error finishing read" means the break of connections caused by driver/kernel bug rather than hardware problems, however check cable.  I experienced this problem even after a few hours of proper work. The good idea is leave opened LinuxCNC for as many time as you can (no matter you do something with, or not ).
6. I tried use PnCConf two times (the first and the last) and not recommend this to anybody. Better option is to find config similar to your needs and change something in text editor.

IIRC the original parallel port could switch up to 1,000,000 times a second. Assuming two switches per pulse, 8000 pulses per rotation, that's 3750 RPM, which is way more resolution than you need (steppers are 200 steps/rot, or 3200 with microstepping), and way faster than big steppers can probably run anyway.
When I was using steppers and a breakout, it was the steppers that were the limitataion.

  My only concern regarding using my parallel port computer with a breakout board is the delay (hence why I was considering the mesa card). Hypothetically, let's say my jitter isn't a problem. Will my experience making chips be the same as with a mesa card? I want to make some pretty complex parts and am concerned that any amount of jitter could make that impossible. I've attached an STL file of a part that I want to make for a friend. Could this be possible using a parallel port, or should I just spring for the more expensive card?

i will try it.. what i found in my ini... ich have - sign on some scales and outputs... i wired all up + to + and - to -.... but if you look into the pum560 sim file.. you will see that the TCP is upside down.. or is something wrong on my sim file??? thanks

Not sure but it seems a bit odd to me that you have a negative 'D-5' value and asymmetric angles for ALPHA-{3,4,5}:

When the example 'puma560_dh.hal' has:

and the melfa example has:

linuxcnc.org/docs/stable/html/motion/dh-parameters.html

After posting that image of the g code I believe I see it now. The % symbol is on line 5. So that would explain everything being off set considering the line is starting at 1...
I knew it had to have been something silly.

Update: That was it.... 

This is it.

If this isn't the version,  I don't know where it would be.

hi aciera!

i attached the ini hal and a second hal for the dh paramters.

possible i see somethnig not.. but genserkins with the MDH made me crazy .. hope i can fix it with the help of the forum!


Thanks for the quick answer!

Not much to go on. Please post your hal and ini files.

Also, please post the gcode

TheTinkeringMechanic1 wrote:

3.4.9

That is most probably the kernel version, not the GUI.
What user interface on screen?
It seems like GmoccaPy.
Upload a picture of the whole screen.