yep no stress. hopefully as time goes on people will test this and use it. just would be a waste if it never got used. But i have 7 cnc machines myself that are getting the conversational stuff and a general upgrade of linuxcnc. and it's worth the time just for me so not too fussed if no one else uses this. machines are getting pretty cool now. with all the auto tool measure stuff it all makes a massive difference how fast jobs get done. and auto tool measuring means that i don't get the chance to make mistakes with tool offsets and they always stay loaded so i don't do any hacks. cause the fastest option is clicking measure and walking away to carry on programming on cam

cheers

man this looks just like my place in NZ you get the machine bug and it bites hard aye lol. and then its more and more machines until its hard to stop

First of all, thank you very much for your interest and support. The diagram you sent already formed my starting point. However, since there is a 90-degree difference between the slider joint and the next joint, I wanted to redo the calculations.

Also, since Genserkins only supports rotary axes, I will not be using it. I will recreate the kinematics according to my system.

Moin,

ich bin der Meinung, dass es nichts mit linuxcnc zu tun hat, sondern mit
fusion 360..?
Karlhe

Ich habe das Programm in fusion 360 mit dem Prozessor von estlcam rechnen lassen. der fährt die kontur ohne radius, dass hat 
funktioniert. Der Postprozesseor von linuxcnc sollte beim abfahren von Konturen vielleicht doch noch überarbeitet werden.

The Linux CNC FPGA control board I bought connects to the motor driver, and it works perfectly with the 74HC245.

There is no problem connecting the DM542 using the 74HC245.
 

The FPGA (3.3V) is directly connected to the 74HC245 (5V).
 

it's the data received by the controller from drives

Is the DH parameters below right?
 
 

Any LinuxCNC users that have an opinion of PureCutCNC?
I'm not involved but it look kind if nice.
purecutcnc.github.io/

Tut mir Leid für die Falsche Fährte.

Ich habe das Problem nicht reproduzieren können in meinen Testconfigs. dürfte ich deine INI sehen um die zu vergleichen? 

mfg

managed to fix this by completely rebuilding the config, no idea what was causing it

  Danke, ich füge das nc programm hinzu.

ich habe das programm mit nc viewer laufen lassen, keine Fehler


Karlhe

viewsat wrote:

PCW wrote:

If this is a drive level issue, note that a 26C31 does not swing to 5V
and its output level is about 2 diode drops below 5V (3.6V) with a 5 mA load.
I connected the motor driver using +5V and A-.
 

 

Yes, connected that way you would get close to 5V drive.

The issue with the 26C31 is that the high level drive does not swing to 5V
but the low level drive does swing close to 0V.

 

G91.1 ist eigentlich standard für I,J,k , ausgehend vom Kreismittelpunkt. Diese parameter werden ässerst selten als absolutwert angewendet.
Das Problem mit Fusion360 und Kreisendpunktfehler taucht seit langer Zeit immer wieder auf. Vielleicht ist da was mit Nachkommastellen, 3 für metrisch und sonst 4

Einige Ideen bringt auch die websuche:

fusion360 linuxcnc end of arc differ