LinuxCNC-RIO - RealtimeIO for LinuxCNC based on FPGA (ICE40 / ECP5)

mBender wrote:

Awesome. I will test it with my oscilloscope. I wonder if I need something like a pull down resistor after/before the level shifter.

I noticed that the one of my outputs is not always switching. It's tied to the "machine on" but when I toggle the machine on an off, sometimes it's not reacting. I also get some error messages in the Terminal.

This is my current wiring.
 

meister wrote:

if i have overlooked any open questions, please ask again, i was a bit busy at the weekend and lost the thread

---

here is my excuse:mitsubishi rv-e2 

 

without controller and one harmonic drive is broken
 

{
    "name": "IceShield",
    "description": "RIO-IceShield board for Raspberry PI4",
    "url": "https://github.com/multigcs/rio-iceshield",
    "pinimage": "board.png",
    "toolchain": "icestorm",
    "family": "ice40",
    "type": "up5k",
    "package": "sg48",
    "startup": "gpio mode 7 clock\ngpio clock 7 5000000",
    "flashcmd": "./spiflash.sh rio.bin",
    "clock": {
        "osc": "18000000",
        "speed": "29812000",
        "pin": "35"
    },

tommylight wrote:

Just a stab in the dark, but does the TX0108E have capacitors wired to power lines and close to the chip?
A 10 microFarad electrolytic and a 0.1 micro ceramic should do.
 
 

digiex_chris wrote:

tommylight wrote:

Just a stab in the dark, but does the TX0108E have capacitors wired to power lines and close to the chip?
A 10 microFarad electrolytic and a 0.1 micro ceramic should do.
 
 
I'm not as familiar with the TX0108E , but another option is to switch the low side instead of the high side. Such as a simple transistor between the - of the driver and GND, if that's an option for your stepper driver. (See image).

I wonder if you're running into voltage drop on the TX0108E if you're switching the high side? I also wonder if the Tang Nano can't push enough current on the 5v rail for your application, maybe provide an external 5v source to VB? Perhaps monitor VB with the scope as well, see how stable that is?

 

digiex_chris wrote:

well, last night I got first movements to work on my iceshield derivative, and got the scale correct. Trying to get my head around the PID settings, I'm a bit lost since I'm normally a stepper guy working with more direct controllers that work similar to parallel port setups, 1 step = 1 step moved, no hunting position. this seems to be treating the fpga as it would treat a servo with encoder feedback. The position doesn't quite reach the commanded position, and it hunts a little, which I find odd for open-loop steppers with no encoder feedback.

Can anyone enlighten me on how to tune this? Is P too high? I have a feeling it maybe should be set to 1.0 instead of the default 250 so there is no gain.
 

mBender wrote:

digiex_chris wrote:

tommylight wrote:

Just a stab in the dark, but does the TX0108E have capacitors wired to power lines and close to the chip?
A 10 microFarad electrolytic and a 0.1 micro ceramic should do.
 
 
I'm not as familiar with the TX0108E , but another option is to switch the low side instead of the high side. Such as a simple transistor between the - of the driver and GND, if that's an option for your stepper driver. (See image).

I wonder if you're running into voltage drop on the TX0108E if you're switching the high side? I also wonder if the Tang Nano can't push enough current on the 5v rail for your application, maybe provide an external 5v source to VB? Perhaps monitor VB with the scope as well, see how stable that is?

 

I thought about the Transistor solution as well. I have actually some transistors laying around, but the fact that the new level shifter should arrive any minute has me stopped that. At least for the moment. 

The power supply from the Tang is stable. I had that suspicion too and tested it with my oscilloscope. 5V is clean and no power drop.

What I have found out is that the bidirectional level shifter have some weird logic to figure out which side is driving and it seems they create often problems. I even tried to put the output side with a pull up / pull down. No difference.

I think something like a 74ACT245 where you can external control the direction might be better for this application.