Downdraft design questions
- txtrone
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 384
 - Thank you received: 106
 
			
	
						09 Nov 2020 23:17				#188824
		by txtrone
	
	
		
			
				
I got it loaded and when I jog around the 'table' (simulated only since I have nothing connected to my Mesa card yet) the pins change as I moved from section to section. That's good stuff!
Refresh my memory, should I use some LEDs on the Mesa card to prove that the outputs are firing the same as the pins in the HAL confifuration?
Also, where does the is 'net zone' code belong? Is that the example code for zone 0 only? Should it look like this when I am finished?
			
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by txtrone on topic Downdraft design questions			
			Next step is to connect each trigger pin to a real output pin. (Remember what I said about diodes). I generally would do it like this:
net zone0 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-0 net zone0 => hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-00
I got it loaded and when I jog around the 'table' (simulated only since I have nothing connected to my Mesa card yet) the pins change as I moved from section to section. That's good stuff!
Refresh my memory, should I use some LEDs on the Mesa card to prove that the outputs are firing the same as the pins in the HAL confifuration?
Also, where does the is 'net zone' code belong? Is that the example code for zone 0 only? Should it look like this when I am finished?
net zone0 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-0
net zone0 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-00
net zone1 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-1
net zone1 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-01
net zone2 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-2
net zone2 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-02
net zone3 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-3
net zone3 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-03
net zone4 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-4
net zone4 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-04
net zone5 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-5
net zone5 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-05
net zone6 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-6
net zone6 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-06
net zone7 <= ddraft4x2.0.trigger-7
net zone7 =>  hm2_7i76e.0.7i76.0.0.output-07Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						10 Nov 2020 01:25				#188832
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic Downdraft design questions			
			
				That was painless!
That looks right. Yes, I only did one example! The outputs may need to be different as you might already be using a pin for torch on or something.
If you upgrade linuxcnc, you may need to redo the halcompile step as the component is not native to linuxcnc.
There is also a separate zone pin that publishes a numeric number for the current zone. If you were ambitious you could modify your GUI to display the number from that pin. Or add a row of GUI LED's for each zone.
Very cool. Can't wait to see how it works for you!
					That looks right. Yes, I only did one example! The outputs may need to be different as you might already be using a pin for torch on or something.
If you upgrade linuxcnc, you may need to redo the halcompile step as the component is not native to linuxcnc.
There is also a separate zone pin that publishes a numeric number for the current zone. If you were ambitious you could modify your GUI to display the number from that pin. Or add a row of GUI LED's for each zone.
Very cool. Can't wait to see how it works for you!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						10 Nov 2020 02:28				#188833
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
				
I would keep all the connections in the ddraft4x2.hal file
I have used a 22mmm mount 24V LED light to confirm working but to use a LED you would need a 2.2k 1/2 W current limiting resistor
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic Downdraft design questions			
			Refresh my memory, should I use some LEDs on the Mesa card to prove that the outputs are firing the same as the pins in the HAL confifuration?
Also, where does the is 'net zone' code belong? Is that the example code for zone 0 only? Should it look like this when I am finished?
I would keep all the connections in the ddraft4x2.hal file
I have used a 22mmm mount 24V LED light to confirm working but to use a LED you would need a 2.2k 1/2 W current limiting resistor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						10 Nov 2020 02:30				#188835
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic Downdraft design questions			
			
				You could also confirm output operation just by jogging in to each zone and use a multimeter on the output			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- txtrone
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 384
 - Thank you received: 106
 
			
	
						10 Nov 2020 13:14				#188869
		by txtrone
	
	
		
			
				
The pain is still coming, I have not yet connected anything to my Mesa card yet, just the card to the PC and a 5V power supply.
I got a small desktop 8U rack (last night) so I can start putting everything together for testing. Maybe this won't be as complex as I am imagining, no... I bet it will be.
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by txtrone on topic Downdraft design questions			
			That was painless!
The pain is still coming, I have not yet connected anything to my Mesa card yet, just the card to the PC and a 5V power supply.
I got a small desktop 8U rack (last night) so I can start putting everything together for testing. Maybe this won't be as complex as I am imagining, no... I bet it will be.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- txtrone
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 384
 - Thank you received: 106
 
			
	
						11 Nov 2020 21:55				#189049
		by txtrone
	
	
		
			
				
Do you think either of these two fans would be up to the job?
www.grainger.com/product/DAYTON-7-1-2-HP...ressure-Blower-7D752
www.grainger.com/product/DAYTON-High-Pressure-Blower-7AV38
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by txtrone on topic Downdraft design questions			
			This article suggests 3200-3600 CFM for a 4' x 4' table
www.hypertherm.com/learn/spark-the-blog/fume-control/
So for a table that size you would need a LOT of air. 16000 cfm.
Most commercial tables are zoned
Assuming you are going to use Linuxcnc's Plasmac, I would suggest you add an air activated shutter on each of the 8 outlets that is triggered based on the position of the x & y axis. You don't need seperate compartments to contain the air. Better that you don't
so by using 8 zones, you would reduce the air flow requirement to a much more reasonable 2000 CFM
Do you think either of these two fans would be up to the job?
www.grainger.com/product/DAYTON-7-1-2-HP...ressure-Blower-7D752
www.grainger.com/product/DAYTON-High-Pressure-Blower-7AV38
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- txtrone
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 384
 - Thank you received: 106
 
			
	
						11 Nov 2020 22:20				#189052
		by txtrone
	
	
		
			
	
	
			 		
													
	
				Replied by txtrone on topic Downdraft design questions			
			
				Working properly with the correct 5/2 valve. Thanks Rodw!
Added a speed controller (after this video was taken) and it was much smoother.
			
					Added a speed controller (after this video was taken) and it was much smoother.
		The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw, thefabricator03 	
			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						11 Nov 2020 23:04				#189061
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
	
	
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic Downdraft design questions			
			
				This is gunna be an awesome experiment! I can't really advise on the fan size but I suspect either will do. You have a fairly small duct so perhaps the pressures will be higher...			
					
		The following user(s) said Thank You: txtrone 	
			Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rodw
 - 
				
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 11472
 - Thank you received: 3848
 
			
	
						11 Nov 2020 23:07				#189062
		by rodw
	
	
		
			
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by rodw on topic Downdraft design questions			
			
				Also, you when you get it going, you could look at using an or2 component on zones  0 & 1, 2 & 3, 4 &5, 6 & 7 so both zones open together full width of your Z. but will need more fan output... BUt we can leave that for another day...			
					Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- txtrone
 - 
				
									Topic Author
											 - Offline
 - Platinum Member
 - 
				
			 
		Less
		More
		
			
	
		- Posts: 384
 - Thank you received: 106
 
			
	
						11 Nov 2020 23:15				#189065
		by txtrone
	
	
		
			
				
What would you go with? Direct drive 7.5HP open drip proof motor, or 5HP belt drive totally enclosed fan cooled? Performance wise they both have pros and cons, the belt drive does seem to have more 'torque' for lack of a better word, the CFM output falls more slowly that the direct drive. Somewhere between 5 and 6 in/SP the 5HP belt driven model passes the 7.5HP direct drive in CFM. I don't know if that makes a difference or not in my situation.
I am leaning toward the 5HP for some reason, normally I would be all about direct drive.
					
	
			
			 		
													
	
				Replied by txtrone on topic Downdraft design questions			
			This is gunna be an awesome experiment! I can't really advise on the fan size but I suspect either will do. You have a fairly small duct so perhaps the pressures will be higher...
What would you go with? Direct drive 7.5HP open drip proof motor, or 5HP belt drive totally enclosed fan cooled? Performance wise they both have pros and cons, the belt drive does seem to have more 'torque' for lack of a better word, the CFM output falls more slowly that the direct drive. Somewhere between 5 and 6 in/SP the 5HP belt driven model passes the 7.5HP direct drive in CFM. I don't know if that makes a difference or not in my situation.
I am leaning toward the 5HP for some reason, normally I would be all about direct drive.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
		Moderators: snowgoer540	
		Time to create page: 0.120 seconds