Rods "Spaceship" Scratch built Plasma Cutter build

More
10 Apr 2020 11:54 - 10 Apr 2020 11:57 #163471 by rodw
So here is what we had left...
Attachments:
Last edit: 10 Apr 2020 11:57 by rodw.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight, thefabricator03, CNCFred

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 Apr 2020 15:19 #163496 by tommylight
Efficient use of material ! Nice.
The following user(s) said Thank You: CNCFred

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 07:25 #163579 by CNCFred
As hobbyist I am very impressed!
The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 09:31 #163590 by thefabricator03


And for the diehard fanatics here is an extended one.


Rod, Is that video sped up? Or is that real time?

That machine is sure moving!
The following user(s) said Thank You: RotarySMP

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 09:55 - 11 Apr 2020 09:57 #163592 by rodw


Rod, Is that video sped up? Or is that real time?

That machine is sure moving!


Yes its in real time 2239 mm/min per the Thermal Dynamics book speed for 40 amps 2mm mild steel. But rapids I think are 21 metres/min.

I did not have any probe errors on that job because the uncut material at the back holding it down but the last 600 x 1200 piece needed a lot of nursing. You might not see it on thicker material but this stuff can warp upwards 40mm plus which means its higher than the probe height so I get a lot of unexpected probe errors before it gets to probe height. Usually I just push the down material flat for the probe but really I think Plasmac could change its probing algorithm to solve this.

What I'd like to see is if probing commences and the probe is hit above the probe height, Plasmac should back up 10mm or so, change its probe height and reprobe for that pierce only. That would make it a lot more automated and more commercially robust. I have mentioned this once before (probably a few months ago when I did this job last!)
Last edit: 11 Apr 2020 09:57 by rodw.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 09:59 #163594 by thefabricator03
What thickness sheet are you cutting?

I cut a bunch of 1.6mm sheet this week and had a similar issue with the warping.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 10:06 #163595 by rodw
Thats 2mm. It is something Plasmac should handle I think.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 10:47 #163596 by phillc54

What I'd like to see is if probing commences and the probe is hit above the probe height, Plasmac should back up 10mm or so, change its probe height and reprobe for that pierce only. That would make it a lot more automated and more commercially robust. I have mentioned this once before (probably a few months ago when I did this job last!)


I don't recall that, maybe I missed it.

I do recall that quite a while ago I mentioned that I had some different ideas for probing but I never got any feedback so I lost interest.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 12:41 #163599 by thefabricator03
Phil, If you add those changes that Rod suggested, I am more than happy to test it out. I have a ton of 1.6mm sheet offcuts I can use to test.
The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Apr 2020 12:42 - 11 Apr 2020 12:53 #163600 by rodw

I don't recall that, maybe I missed it.

I do recall that quite a while ago I mentioned that I had some different ideas for probing but I never got any feedback so I lost interest.


I did not really understand how Plasmac worked back then.
Well with a bit of luck Stefan and I can convince you to regain your interest.
Last edit: 11 Apr 2020 12:53 by rodw.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.139 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum