What do you really get for a $350 desk top engraver ?
- machinedude
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 698
- Thank you received: 305
09 Apr 2025 07:23 #325966
by machinedude
Replied by machinedude on topic What do you really get for a $350 desk top engraver ?
it was on a belt drive with an omega style configuration.
The following user(s) said Thank You: spumco
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- spumco
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1923
- Thank you received: 766
09 Apr 2025 11:30 #325978
by spumco
Sounds like excessive belt tension is the culprit - maybe in conjunction with a defect in the motor shaft.
Any room to mount a bearing on the motor shaft outboard of the timing pulley? Or drive an intermediate shaft which is supported at both ends using a typical flex coupling (oldham, lovejoy, etc.)?
Replied by spumco on topic What do you really get for a $350 desk top engraver ?
I should have looked back in this thread - you did post some pics of the arrangement.it was on a belt drive with an omega style configuration.
Sounds like excessive belt tension is the culprit - maybe in conjunction with a defect in the motor shaft.
Any room to mount a bearing on the motor shaft outboard of the timing pulley? Or drive an intermediate shaft which is supported at both ends using a typical flex coupling (oldham, lovejoy, etc.)?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- machinedude
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 698
- Thank you received: 305
09 Apr 2025 14:03 #325988
by machinedude
Replied by machinedude on topic What do you really get for a $350 desk top engraver ?
not easily so if it happens again i might have to rethink things. this was on the X axis so not too much mass being moved. the whole machine is pretty light less than 100lbs the X might hit 20lbs if that. most of the weight is the t-slot table and gantry beam.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.097 seconds