retrofit on EMCO PC turn 55

More
20 Jul 2012 23:32 #22253 by andypugh
bobinater wrote:

I agree andy but I would rather spend the money on the hnc lathe that I have been obsessing over


Good point.

Does the Emco eat much? Why not ignore it for a few months then do a fast cheap conversion on it when you know how?
(or do it now as a training exercise)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
20 Jul 2012 23:51 #22254 by bobinater
food for thought


I would still rather have the hardinge but I may take good sage advise and retro the EMCO first

as a training exercise.



Ill think about that for a day or so, I do have someone interested in the emco if I can get it working right.

but on the other hand it is eating nothing but space



Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 01:47 - 21 Jul 2012 01:58 #22258 by jrkeat
bobinater wrote:

Thanks Chuck


I will have to dig a little deeper and see if I can figure it out , or do the discount sale to get rid of it

any idea what they are worth, probably alot less than I gave for it:angry:


Bob


Functioning with the original software, the PCTurn 55 is worth 5-6K. Without, it is worth about 2K, as it is only useable with an electronics retrofit which is a good-sized project.

If it's a hardware problem, the turret shouldn't be too hard to fix--much easier than converting the machine to LinuxCNC, if I may baspheme in this forum. If it's like the 55, there should be 2 LEDs on the main controller board which flash when the turret is on. One will flash when each tool goes by, and the other will flash when the turret does a full rotation.

In my machine, there is a 5-pin connector from the main board. The rightmost line takes 24v, and when activated, this switches the turrett on. When the 24v is removed, the turret will reverse direction, backing up until it is limited by a ratcheting mechanism. The other four lines are gnd, 5V, and the two output lines.

In any case if one of the signal lines has gone bad, doing a retrofit won't fix it. So my first step would be to check to see if it works by itself, both in terms of input and output, and fix it if it doesn't.

If one of the two outputs has failed, you can probably fix it. There is no separate fault line--the main board only knows what the turret is doing through those two lines. So if the changer runs at all, I would guess one of them must have failed, and the main computer detects the failure, generating the fault.
Last edit: 21 Jul 2012 01:58 by jrkeat.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 02:15 #22259 by andypugh
jrkeat wrote:

If it's a hardware problem, the turret shouldn't be too hard to fix--much easier than converting the machine to LinuxCNC, if I may baspheme in this forum.


I don't think that saying that apples =/= oranges is normally considered blasphemy. I agree that if it is hardware then you need to fix the hardware. A LinuxCNC conversion of a broken machine will still leave you with a broken machine. The only reason to covert in that case is to have full access to the underlying "stuff" rather than a baffling array of black boxes (literally and figuratively)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 16:51 #22277 by chuck1024
So far I have converted a Prolight 1000 and a Emco PCturn 55 to LinuxCNC. Both machines used antiquated hardware, PCs and software. I chose to learn something new and move forward rather they trying to learn something that was already obsolete and hard to maintain. I should add that I am an engineer so these kind of projects are fun and rewarding to me but might not be to others. I have also done a lot of programming and I really liked some feature like loops and named variables that LinuxCNC provides. The more I use Linux, the less I like Microsoft.

cs

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 17:05 #22278 by bobinater
actually the tool changer works in mdi . I can rotate the turret with the keyboard function


but when I use a tool change in the program it errors out,


if i am not mistaken the format for the tool change in the program is as such


t202 which would be tool 2 offset 2 is this correct for the emco and for linux as well.



Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 17:16 #22280 by andypugh
bobinater wrote:

if i am not mistaken the format for the tool change in the program is as such

t202 which would be tool 2 offset 2 is this correct for the emco and for linux as well.


That isn't how it works in LinuxCNC, though someone is working on making it an option.
In LinuxCNC there are a number of steps.
T3 sets the "tool prepare" pin to 3 so that the tool changer can get itself ready. (you might actually do this after a tool change on some machines, to get the carousel into the right place).
M6 starts the tool change process, including moving the axes to the tool change position, it sets a tool-change pin in hal, and waits until the tool-changes pin is set.
G43 applies the offsets for the currently loaded tool. G43 Hn applies the offsets from a different tool number.

So, a typical tool change line in LinuxCNC reads T4M6G43,

But see: sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&ati...539522&group_id=6744

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 17:26 #22282 by BigJohnT
In LinuxCNC the maximum tool and pocket number is 99999. I wonder how they plan on making that work with the Emco option?

John

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 18:10 #22287 by bobinater
that looks alot like mill code to me


lathe code for most lathes that I have seen do not use


g43 or a m6 call out so I will have to get used to that if I start using linux or can that be altered in the base program?



Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2012 18:13 #22288 by bobinater
here is an example of a lathe program that I wrote for a lug binding screw

for work, does this look at all like a linux post would or will I have to rebuild my post processor as well


Bob



%
O05005 (BINDING-SCREW)
N1 G20 G40 G80
N2 T303
N3 S1200 M03
N4 G00 X0. Z5.
N5 G98
N6 G82 X0. Z-0.0937 F20. R0.05
N7 G80
N8 G99
N9 G00 Z5.
N10 M05
N11 T308
N12 S1500 M03
N13 Z5.
N14 G98
N15 G83 X0. Z-0.6992 F20. R0.05 Q0.1
N16 G80
N17 G99
N18 G00 Z0.1
N19 M05
N20 T101
N21 G50 S1800
N22 G96 S400 M03
N23 G00 X0.0688 Z0.
N24 G01 X-0.0312 F0.005
N25 X0.3644
N26 X0.7284 Z-0.0214
N27 Z-0.0591
N28 X0.9026
N29 X0.9928 Z-0.1086
N30 Z-0.7354
N31 G98
N32 G01 X1.1928 F100.
N33 T202
N34 G97 S500
N35 G99
N36 G00 X1.0928 Z0.0654
N37 X0.9826
N38 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N39 G00 X1.0928
N40 Z0.0654
N41 X0.9726
N42 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N43 G00 X1.0928
N44 Z0.0654
N45 X0.963
N46 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N47 G00 X1.0928
N48 Z0.0654
N49 X0.9536
N50 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N51 G00 X1.0928
N52 Z0.0654
N53 X0.9448
N54 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N55 G00 X1.0928
N56 Z0.0654
N57 X0.936
N58 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N59 G00 X1.0928
N60 Z0.0654
N61 X0.9278
N62 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N63 G00 X1.0928
N64 Z0.0654
N65 X0.9198
N66 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N67 G00 X1.0928
N68 Z0.0654
N69 X0.9122
N70 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N71 G00 X1.0928
N72 Z0.0654
N73 X0.9048
N74 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N75 G00 X1.0928
N76 Z0.0654
N77 X0.8978
N78 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N79 G00 X1.0928
N80 Z0.0654
N81 X0.8912
N82 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N83 G00 X1.0928
N84 Z0.0654
N85 X0.8848
N86 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N87 G00 X1.0928
N88 Z0.0654
N89 X0.8788
N90 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N91 G00 X1.0928
N92 Z0.0654
N93 X0.8732
N94 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N95 G00 X1.0928
N96 Z0.0654
N97 X0.8678
N98 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N99 G00 X1.0928
N100 Z0.0654
N101 X0.8628
N102 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N103 G00 X1.0928
N104 Z0.0654
N105 X0.8582
N106 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N107 G00 X1.0928
N108 Z0.0654
N109 X0.8538
N110 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N111 G00 X1.0928
N112 Z0.0654
N113 X0.8498
N114 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N115 G00 X1.0928
N116 Z0.0654
N117 X0.8462
N118 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N119 G00 X1.0928
N120 Z0.0654
N121 X0.8428
N122 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N123 G00 X1.0928
N124 Z0.0654
N125 X0.8396
N126 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N127 G00 X1.0928
N128 Z0.0654
N129 X0.837
N130 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N131 G00 X1.0928
N132 Z0.0654
N133 X0.8346
N134 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N135 G00 X1.0928
N136 Z0.0654
N137 X0.8326
N138 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N139 G00 X1.0928
N140 Z0.0654
N141 X0.8308
N142 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N143 G00 X1.0928
N144 Z0.0654
N145 X0.8294
N146 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N147 G00 X1.0928
N148 Z0.0654
N149 X0.8284
N150 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N151 G00 X1.0928
N152 Z0.0654
N153 X0.8276
N154 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N155 G00 X1.0928
N156 Z0.0654
N157 X0.8272
N158 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N159 G00 X1.0928
N160 Z0.0654
N161 X0.8272
N162 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N163 G00 X1.0928
N164 Z0.0654
N165 X0.8272
N166 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N167 G00 X1.0928
N168 Z0.0654
N169 X0.8272
N170 G32 Z-0.6937 F0.125
N171 G00 X1.0928
N172 Z5.
N173 M05
N174 T404
N175 G50 S1800 F0.002
N176 G96 S300 F0.0015 M03
N177 G00 X1.05
N178 Z-0.65
N179 G01 X-0.01 F0.0015
N180 G00 X1.
N181 Z5.
N182 M05
N183 M30
%

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.131 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum