- Posts: 201
- Thank you received: 18
Retrofitting a 1986 Maho MH400E
- Glemigobles
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- drimaropoylos
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Thank you received: 40
I thing you are right, g17,g18,g19 is a better way compared to separate configurations.Glemigobles wrote: But when it comes to spindle orientation (horizontal vs vertical) I thought you'd just use G17/18 and program the parts in CAM with the setup you want. At least that's the standard practice described in the Philips manual and the same codes are available in LinuxCNC as well.
John
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 19899
- Thank you received: 4655
drimaropoylos wrote: I thing you are right, g17,g18,g19 is a better way compared to separate configurations.
Most CAM systems assume that the tool is aligned along Z (and, in fact, LinuxCNC assumes that for canned cycles) to having the spindle aligned along the system Y can often be annoying.
I will quite often MDI stuff that way anyway, but if using CAM then I have to change config.
And then there is the question of arbor-cutters . I am not sure if any of the CAM systems are very good at that...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- R2AIV
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 17
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andypugh
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 19899
- Thank you received: 4655
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RotarySMP
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1635
- Thank you received: 595
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.