Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
06 Nov 2022 13:36 #256066
by JT
Replied by JT on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
I just tried
and got hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read! itr-25604 so quite a bit better but not good enough for a machine. Good think this is my dev PC.
JT
john@cave:~$ uname -a
Linux cave 5.10.0-18-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Debian 5.10.140-1 (2022-09-02) x86_64 GNU/Linuxand got hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read! itr-25604 so quite a bit better but not good enough for a machine. Good think this is my dev PC.
JT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 14:15 #256068
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
I would try 6.1 and 4.19
6.1:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential bin86 kernel-package libqt4-dev #libncurses5-dev pkg-config libssl-dev
mkdir rtlinux
cd rtlinux
wget git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-6.1-rc3.tar.gz
wget www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects...6.1-rc3-rt2.patch.gz
tar -xpf linux-6.1-rc3.tar.gz
gunzip patch-6.1-rc3-rt2.patch.gz
cp patch-6.1-rc3-rt2.patch linux-6.1-rc3
cd linux-6.1-rc3
cat patch-6.1-rc3-rt2.patch | patch -p1
make xconfig
make -j4
sudo make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 modules_install
sudo make install
4.19
cd ~
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential bin86 kernel-package libqt4-dev #libncurses5-dev pkg-config libssl-dev
mkdir rtlinux
cd rtlinux
wget www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.19.255.tar.xz
wget www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects...9.255-rt113.patch.gz
tar -xpf linux-4.19.255.tar.xz
gunzip patch-4.19.255-rt113.patch.gz
cp patch-4.19.255-rt113.patch linux-4.19.255
cd linux-4.19.255
cat patch-4.19.255-rt113.patch | patch -p1
make xconfig
make -j4
sudo make modules_install
sudo make install
Both work acceptably on my somewhat troublesome Elite 800 G1
6.1:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential bin86 kernel-package libqt4-dev #libncurses5-dev pkg-config libssl-dev
mkdir rtlinux
cd rtlinux
wget git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-6.1-rc3.tar.gz
wget www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects...6.1-rc3-rt2.patch.gz
tar -xpf linux-6.1-rc3.tar.gz
gunzip patch-6.1-rc3-rt2.patch.gz
cp patch-6.1-rc3-rt2.patch linux-6.1-rc3
cd linux-6.1-rc3
cat patch-6.1-rc3-rt2.patch | patch -p1
make xconfig
make -j4
sudo make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 modules_install
sudo make install
4.19
cd ~
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install build-essential bin86 kernel-package libqt4-dev #libncurses5-dev pkg-config libssl-dev
mkdir rtlinux
cd rtlinux
wget www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.19.255.tar.xz
wget www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects...9.255-rt113.patch.gz
tar -xpf linux-4.19.255.tar.xz
gunzip patch-4.19.255-rt113.patch.gz
cp patch-4.19.255-rt113.patch linux-4.19.255
cd linux-4.19.255
cat patch-4.19.255-rt113.patch | patch -p1
make xconfig
make -j4
sudo make modules_install
sudo make install
Both work acceptably on my somewhat troublesome Elite 800 G1
The following user(s) said Thank You: JT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 14:37 #256070
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
Also if your test PC has a Intel Ethernet chip, you must disable irq coalescing
with ethtool.
Checking ping times will tell you if this is successful.
with ethtool.
Checking ping times will tell you if this is successful.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 14:46 #256072
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
What sort of ping times should we see?
I'm at between .214 to .340 ms now.
I'm at between .214 to .340 ms now.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 14:51 - 06 Nov 2022 14:55 #256074
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
That's pretty bad
What Host and what Ethernet chip?
Heres My 800 G1:
(note, the first ping is longer because an ARP request/reply are added)
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.180 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.122 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.136 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.123 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.122 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
I get better (about 80-100) on a 8300
What Host and what Ethernet chip?
Heres My 800 G1:
(note, the first ping is longer because an ARP request/reply are added)
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.180 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.122 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.136 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.123 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.122 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.121 ms
I get better (about 80-100) on a 8300
Last edit: 06 Nov 2022 14:55 by PCW. Reason: sp
The following user(s) said Thank You: tommylight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 20:35 #256093
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
This is from Mint21 install.
My older system is OK, but Mint21 has great features.
sh@sh-HP-EliteDesk-800-G1-SFF:~$ uname -a
Linux sh-HP-EliteDesk-800-G1-SFF 5.19.0-2-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Debian 5.19.11-1 (2022-09-24) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
sh@sh-HP-EliteDesk-800-G1-SFF:~$ ping 10.10.10.10
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.517 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.330 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.249 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.348 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.295 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.241 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.340 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.213 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.313 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.221 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.271 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.234 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.270 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.275 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.254 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.275 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=0.282 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=0.276 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=0.246 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=0.302 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.277 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.323 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=0.235 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=0.271 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=0.313 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=0.287 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=0.328 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=0.279 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=0.267 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=0.344 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=0.249 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=0.246 ms
My older system is OK, but Mint21 has great features.
sh@sh-HP-EliteDesk-800-G1-SFF:~$ uname -a
Linux sh-HP-EliteDesk-800-G1-SFF 5.19.0-2-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Debian 5.19.11-1 (2022-09-24) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
sh@sh-HP-EliteDesk-800-G1-SFF:~$ ping 10.10.10.10
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.517 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.330 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.249 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.348 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.295 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.241 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.340 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.213 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.313 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.221 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.271 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.234 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.270 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.275 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.254 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.275 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=0.282 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=0.276 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=0.246 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=0.302 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.277 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.323 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=0.235 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=0.271 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=0.313 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=0.287 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=0.328 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=0.279 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=0.267 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=0.344 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=0.249 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=0.246 ms
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 21:00 #256096
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
The ping times are about the same on Debian, but no errors.
sh@debian:~$ uname -a
Linux debian 4.19.0-17-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian 4.19.194-2 (2021-06-21) x86_64 GNU/Linux
sh@debian:~$ ping 10.10.10.10
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.477 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.399 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.279 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.305 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.309 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.328 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.319 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.310 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.306 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.270 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.208 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.356 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.302 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.361 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.253 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.328 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=0.284 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=0.314 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=0.283 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=0.306 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.361 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.388 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
--- 10.10.10.10 ping statistics ---
27 packets transmitted, 27 received, 0% packet loss, time 656ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.208/0.317/0.477/0.050 ms
sh@debian:~$ uname -a
Linux debian 4.19.0-17-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian 4.19.194-2 (2021-06-21) x86_64 GNU/Linux
sh@debian:~$ ping 10.10.10.10
PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.477 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.399 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.279 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.305 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.309 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.328 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.319 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.310 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.306 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.270 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.208 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.356 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.302 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.361 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.253 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.328 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=0.284 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=0.314 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=0.283 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=0.306 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.361 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=0.388 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=0.312 ms
--- 10.10.10.10 ping statistics ---
27 packets transmitted, 27 received, 0% packet loss, time 656ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.208/0.317/0.477/0.050 ms
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Nov 2022 23:43 #256101
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
It looks like you do not have IRQ coalescing disabled
try the ping times after:
sudo ethtool -C [your-ethernet-device-name] rx-usecs 0
try the ping times after:
sudo ethtool -C [your-ethernet-device-name] rx-usecs 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
07 Nov 2022 02:55 #256110
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
This is on Debian
sh@debian:~$ sudo ethtool -C eno1 rx-usecs 0
[sudo] password for sh:
sudo: ethtool: command not found
sh@debian:~$ sudo ethtool -C eno1 rx-usecs 0
[sudo] password for sh:
sudo: ethtool: command not found
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
07 Nov 2022 03:10 #256112
by scotth
Replied by scotth on topic Mesa hm2/hm2_7i96s.0: error finishing read
Yes, found it, and it makes a lot of difference.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=62 ttl=64 time=0.178 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=63 ttl=64 time=0.189 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=64 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=65 ttl=64 time=0.205 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=66 ttl=64 time=0.211 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=67 ttl=64 time=0.198 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=68 ttl=64 time=0.206 ms
^C
--- 10.10.10.10 ping statistics ---
68 packets transmitted, 68 received, 0% packet loss, time 654ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.154/0.198/0.220/0.019 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=62 ttl=64 time=0.178 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=63 ttl=64 time=0.189 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=64 ttl=64 time=0.168 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=65 ttl=64 time=0.205 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=66 ttl=64 time=0.211 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=67 ttl=64 time=0.198 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=68 ttl=64 time=0.206 ms
^C
--- 10.10.10.10 ping statistics ---
68 packets transmitted, 68 received, 0% packet loss, time 654ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.154/0.198/0.220/0.019 ms
The following user(s) said Thank You: rodw
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.190 seconds