GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
03 Nov 2020 02:45 #188170
by pinder
Replied by pinder on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
+1It would probably be useful to retain a GUI setting to disable it. I don't think I would ever disable it from gcode.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Nov 2020 05:35 #188176
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19188
- Thank you received: 6432
03 Nov 2020 06:49 #188179
by tommylight
Replied by tommylight on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
Looking nice!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2388
- Thank you received: 779
03 Nov 2020 11:48 #188206
by snowgoer540
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
This is really looking great!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Nov 2020 17:27 #188245
by grijalvap
Replied by grijalvap on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
I tried to run it in a new 2.8 install and it didn't worked
first thing it claimed was dbounce component.
what version of linuxcnc are you using?
first thing it claimed was dbounce component.
what version of linuxcnc are you using?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Nov 2020 22:20 #188273
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
It is being developed on the Buster ISO with python3 and master branch.
I also have it running on the Stretch ISO with 2.8 and python2
The dbounce component was added in early September, it wouldn't be in the released 2.8 but would be in a Buildbot build.
I also have it running on the Stretch ISO with 2.8 and python2
The dbounce component was added in early September, it wouldn't be in the released 2.8 but would be in a Buildbot build.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Nov 2020 07:59 #189764
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
A question for the guys using the Powermax communications:
Should the enable button for the powermax comms be:
Should the enable button for the powermax comms be:
- Enabled on startup
- Disabled on startup
- Determined by the last time the machine was used
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2388
- Thank you received: 779
19 Nov 2020 11:33 #189768
by snowgoer540
The current behavior is to remember the saved stated (I know you know this... just saying to remind others).
Personally speaking, there are a lot of times I fire the table up with 0 intention of cutting (testing, etc.) and I get annoyed at the popup. I don't want to save it in the "off" position because then I forget to turn it on when I actually go to cut. In these events I could see option 3 being convenient.
Will the error message be similar to how it is currently (if it's enabled and it can't communicate, it times out, gives a message, and disables itself)?
I think for me it would be a toss up between 1 and 3. When I do a lot of testing, it's nice for it to remember the state. That said, for all intents and purposes, it operates via option 1 (always enabled) currently since I never disable it and save the state.
If I had a table I used all the time to make money, or had an employee running it, I would want option 1 to ensure it always communicated.
My vote is option 1, dependent on the behavior if it can't connect.
One last thought, what about if it was option 3, but then before a program ran, if the user has PMX comms, but they are disabled when you press run, it gives you a warning that PMX comms are disabled? I know for the most part people hate dialog boxes, just was spit balling.
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
A question for the guys using the Powermax communications:
Should the enable button for the powermax comms be:
- Enabled on startup
- Disabled on startup
- Determined by the last time the machine was used
The current behavior is to remember the saved stated (I know you know this... just saying to remind others).
Personally speaking, there are a lot of times I fire the table up with 0 intention of cutting (testing, etc.) and I get annoyed at the popup. I don't want to save it in the "off" position because then I forget to turn it on when I actually go to cut. In these events I could see option 3 being convenient.
Will the error message be similar to how it is currently (if it's enabled and it can't communicate, it times out, gives a message, and disables itself)?
I think for me it would be a toss up between 1 and 3. When I do a lot of testing, it's nice for it to remember the state. That said, for all intents and purposes, it operates via option 1 (always enabled) currently since I never disable it and save the state.
If I had a table I used all the time to make money, or had an employee running it, I would want option 1 to ensure it always communicated.
My vote is option 1, dependent on the behavior if it can't connect.
One last thought, what about if it was option 3, but then before a program ran, if the user has PMX comms, but they are disabled when you press run, it gives you a warning that PMX comms are disabled? I know for the most part people hate dialog boxes, just was spit balling.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
19 Nov 2020 11:51 #189771
by phillc54
Replied by phillc54 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
YesWill the error message be similar to how it is currently (if it's enabled and it can't communicate, it times out, gives a message, and disables itself)?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 2388
- Thank you received: 779
19 Nov 2020 12:12 #189773
by snowgoer540
Sweet. Amended rambling post: I choose Option 1.
Replied by snowgoer540 on topic GUI for PlasmaC - QtPlasmac
YesWill the error message be similar to how it is currently (if it's enabled and it can't communicate, it times out, gives a message, and disables itself)?
Sweet. Amended rambling post: I choose Option 1.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: snowgoer540
Time to create page: 0.137 seconds