Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
08 Jun 2018 14:04 #112000
by tecno
Replied by tecno on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
I will try to change SERVO_PERIOD and report back asap.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Jun 2018 14:36 - 08 Jun 2018 14:37 #112004
by tecno
Replied by tecno on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
Sorry, that made it even worse as did 300000. With 200000 I can get into Axis but no other setting it fails directly.
With 200000 I can jog slow via keyboard but shift+arrow = hell is loose as it is with MPG
So there is something odd with servo thread speed, is this LCNC 13 issue or is OS related?
With 2.7.12 I could get rocket speed with MPG to stall my motors but that is nothing I want at all but I could
Now I barely touch the wheel and all hell is loose.
ps. the realtime delay on task 0 issue is also new with 2.7.13 = yes I know my PC is on the boarder
With 200000 I can jog slow via keyboard but shift+arrow = hell is loose as it is with MPG
So there is something odd with servo thread speed, is this LCNC 13 issue or is OS related?
With 2.7.12 I could get rocket speed with MPG to stall my motors but that is nothing I want at all but I could
Now I barely touch the wheel and all hell is loose.
ps. the realtime delay on task 0 issue is also new with 2.7.13 = yes I know my PC is on the boarder
Last edit: 08 Jun 2018 14:37 by tecno.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Jun 2018 15:33 #112006
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
You seem to have lost some zeros.
Try 1,000,000 (or 1.000.000 if that's how you write it in your country)
Try 1,000,000 (or 1.000.000 if that's how you write it in your country)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Jun 2018 15:39 #112007
by tecno
Replied by tecno on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
I´m lost
So 2000000 (2 million) is not the correct way to express this figure as set in INI now that has been working OK.
Should i write 2.000.000 and change it to 1.000.000 instead of 1000000?
So 2000000 (2 million) is not the correct way to express this figure as set in INI now that has been working OK.
Should i write 2.000.000 and change it to 1.000.000 instead of 1000000?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Jun 2018 15:46 #112008
by andypugh
Replied by andypugh on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
In your last message you said that neither 100000 or 300000 worked properly, but I wouldn't expect them to.
With a P-Gain of 1000 I would expect a servo thread period of 1000000, but I wrote it as 1,000,000 to make it clear how many zeros there should be.
The INI file will not work with any form of thousands separator.
With a P-Gain of 1000 I would expect a servo thread period of 1000000, but I wrote it as 1,000,000 to make it clear how many zeros there should be.
The INI file will not work with any form of thousands separator.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 Jun 2018 15:54 #112009
by tecno
Replied by tecno on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
OK, I follow what you say.
So is it time to play with new numbers on P = 1000 on each axis and SERVO_PERIOD ?
So is it time to play with new numbers on P = 1000 on each axis and SERVO_PERIOD ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tommylight
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 19196
- Thank you received: 6434
08 Jun 2018 20:26 #112021
by tommylight
1000000 or 1.000.000 without dots, that is one million,
On your reply you used one hundred thousand and three hundred thousand, that will not work properly.
Replied by tommylight on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
OK, I follow what you say.
So is it time to play with new numbers on P = 1000 on each axis and SERVO_PERIOD ?
1000000 or 1.000.000 without dots, that is one million,
On your reply you used one hundred thousand and three hundred thousand, that will not work properly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Jun 2018 09:36 #112064
by tecno
That was a typo in my reply
Replied by tecno on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
OK, I follow what you say.
So is it time to play with new numbers on P = 1000 on each axis and SERVO_PERIOD ?
1000000 or 1.000.000 without dots, that is one million,
On your reply you used one hundred thousand and three hundred thousand, that will not work properly.
That was a typo in my reply
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Jun 2018 09:40 #112066
by tecno
Replied by tecno on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
Here a new test this morning
First part is with 1000000 setting and from line 100 the setting is 2000000
this picture with 2000000 and only keyboard jogging and it fails after a while.
First part is with 1000000 setting and from line 100 the setting is 2000000
this picture with 2000000 and only keyboard jogging and it fails after a while.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Jun 2018 14:58 #112072
by PCW
Replied by PCW on topic Upgraded to 2.7.13 -- W T F --
This is all quite weird as the differences between 2.7.12 and 2.7.13 are not that significant and not related to Ethernet communications at all. I think something else must have changed when you updated, perhaps specific to your PC
Can you run a latency test on you PC to make sure something bad has not happened to real time...
something like
latency-histogram --nobase
and run it for 1/2 hour or so then use latency-histograms screenshot option to get the image and post it here
Also if you have an Intel MAC you need to set irq coalescing off (if you did not automate this setting you would lose it when you re-booted)
Can you run a latency test on you PC to make sure something bad has not happened to real time...
something like
latency-histogram --nobase
and run it for 1/2 hour or so then use latency-histograms screenshot option to get the image and post it here
Also if you have an Intel MAC you need to set irq coalescing off (if you did not automate this setting you would lose it when you re-booted)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.132 seconds