Advanced Search

This has gone a bit sideways, hence my restraint to delete it, so vote?
Me voting:
all the same!

On the main to the left of the DRO axis labels - the group of buttons
 

25:1
20:1 or 30:1 as i fully agree with Rod and Snowwy, it gives a better working range, although it will be very hard to actually see any difference in normal use, but might be noticeable at very high feed rates as it would track better the surface of the material. Never actually tried to notice as no plans for it, it works and it works very good.

Found it


forum.linuxcnc.org/show-your-stuff/30648-rugbot-1000

If i understand correctly the "MDI queue", i se no reason for it, ever.
It is a simple as manually editing a file and open/run it in LinuxCNC, and i do this a lot.
Once opened, LinuxCNC has also the option to edit it from the file menu, removes the need for looking for it on the drive. LinuxCNC can also edit any opened file, granted the correct text processor is set in the ini file.

thanks, It's work perfectly now

As I also stated on github, I really like the MDI queue, but I understand why some may not want it. Please make it configurable. I would even say that the old queue behavior should be the default, and if someone is making machines to sell, they can put a line into the ini file to remove the queue. No need to take it away from me, I used it a lot... until a few days ago when I upgraded... to find out that someone decided for me that I should not have it!

That would probably require modifying the PlasmaC component code as it is built in:
github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master...ponents/plasmac.comp

I mean this where is in qtdragon_hd gui
linuxcnc.org/docs/html/gui/qtdragon.html#_touch_plate