Feature Request
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
I noticed that yesterday before pushing and fixed it. It works fine here, with your code as well. Strange happenings...
Is there anything about my table that could be different or cause different behavior? Definitely acting odd. It losing the soft limit on a rapid has me nervous lol
Not sure it would help but do you need my hal/ini fileS? Could Rod’s ohmic2 comp be interfering somehow?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
It is possible that the errors caused the Y&Y offsets to not zero out and I don't think the soft limits keep track of the offsets (not 100% sure)
I noticed that yesterday before pushing and fixed it. It works fine here, with your code as well. Strange happenings...
Is there anything about my table that could be different or cause different behavior? Definitely acting odd. It losing the soft limit on a rapid has me nervous lol
It may be worthwhile to keep Halshow open while doing this testing and keep an eye on the X&Y offsets and it they aren't zero (or as close as a float can show zero) when you stop a job then you need to restart LinuxCNC. Attached is my.halshow that I am using while testing. Copy it to your config directory and have the following in the .ini file and it will load when you start LinuxCNC. You can delete anything you don't want to watch. Remove the .txt from the end - I can't belive this forum doesn't allow halshow files...
[APPLICATIONS]
DELAY = 3
APP = halshow my.halshow
I don't believe so.Not sure it would help but do you need my hal/ini fileS? Could Rod’s ohmic2 comp be interfering somehow?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
It is possible that the errors caused the Y&Y offsets to not zero out and I don't think the soft limits keep track of the offsets (not 100% sure)
I noticed that yesterday before pushing and fixed it. It works fine here, with your code as well. Strange happenings...
Is there anything about my table that could be different or cause different behavior? Definitely acting odd. It losing the soft limit on a rapid has me nervous lol
It may be worthwhile to keep Halshow open while doing this testing and keep an eye on the X&Y offsets and it they aren't zero (or as close as a float can show zero) when you stop a job then you need to restart LinuxCNC. Attached is my.halshow that I am using while testing. Copy it to your config directory and have the following in the .ini file and it will load when you start LinuxCNC. You can delete anything you don't want to watch. Remove the .txt from the end - I can't belive this forum doesn't allow halshow files...[APPLICATIONS] DELAY = 3 APP = halshow my.halshow
I don't believe so.Not sure it would help but do you need my hal/ini fileS? Could Rod’s ohmic2 comp be interfering somehow?
Ok, I’ll add that and keep an eye on things.
Anything else I can be doing in the meantime? Any more info I can feed you that might help?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
No, I think you are keeping me occupied.Anything else I can be doing in the meantime? Any more info I can feed you that might help?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
No, I think you are keeping me occupied.Anything else I can be doing in the meantime? Any more info I can feed you that might help?
Haha well if I ever get around to designing a reduction system, you may get a bit of a reprieve while I implement it
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
I have no idea what is going on with that, very strange, so bear with me...
I may copy it.Haha well if I ever get around to designing a reduction system, you may get a bit of a reprieve while I implement it
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
Well I am glad you posted the code you are using because it shows odd behaviour that the code I used doesn't.
I have no idea what is going on with that, very strange, so bear with me...
I may copy it.Haha well if I ever get around to designing a reduction system, you may get a bit of a reprieve while I implement it
Interesting. I wonder what’s special about it. I have gotten a lot of mileage out of testing with it though, so I’ll thank the guy I did the cut for he will get a kick out of it
I wish I knew about the resonance stuff and distance per resolution before I designed the table. I always planned to use linuxcnc, but it wasn’t until I was mostly done with the build that I learned of Plasmac, and even later (table built) that I learned of the Plasma primer. So I now see for myself why everyone uses a reduction system. The ironic thing is I always thought it was about torque and couldn’t understand why there wasn’t enough. Live and learn. Lessons taught by experience are supposed to stick the longest I guess? At any rate I say all of that to say that it’ll be a challenge to work it into the area I have now, without a complete resign... but necessity is the mother of all invention... I hope
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
That is what is putting me off doing it...At any rate I say all of that to say that it’ll be a challenge to work it into the area I have now, without a complete resign...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
Same...That is what is putting me off doing it...
Ok, excited to get out of here today and test it out. Did you find anything profound? Any area of the aforementioned issues I should focus my efforts around?The next lot of mistakes have been pushed.
Also, are the errors cut-recovery related? Or would they have affected the main branch and the mesh branch as well?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.