Feature Request
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
Can you try with it with [JOINT_3]HOME = -0.2
I learnt something today from your config, previously I was always under the assumption that HOME_OFFSET was required to be within or equal to the soft limits. Now I need to fix the PlasmaC docs...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
Sure can, do I need to update or anything first? Or just change that value?Oops, I am blind
Can you try with it with [JOINT_3]HOME = -0.2
Well if whatever I did in my config seemed like a stroke of brilliance on my partI learnt something today from your config, previously I was always under the assumption that HOME_OFFSET was required to be within or equal to the soft limits.
We need to find a way to keep those in sync... or maybe you can send me the changes and I will work them into the doc I am editing? Hopefully we can avoid my editing a doc that's too far out of date haha. Open to suggestion.Now I need to fix the PlasmaC docs...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
Yep, just change the value.Sure can, do I need to update or anything first? Or just change that value?
Shoot, I forgot about that. I'll think of something...We need to find a way to keep those in sync... or maybe you can send me the changes and I will work them into the doc I am editing? Hopefully we can avoid my editing a doc that's too far out of date haha. Open to suggestion.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
Why does that make a difference??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
As Dewey pointed out to me a while ago, when offsets are active the axis should not go near the soft limits. I set the maximum Z offset to 5mm (0.0196") below X max. In your config the Z home was 0.001" below the Z max while still active.Changed to -0.2. Seemed to work fine now!
Why does that make a difference??
I will need to fix the docs and maybe have a popup warning when LinuxCNC is loaded when it finds the settings may cause issues.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
As Dewey pointed out to me a while ago, when offsets are active the axis should not go near the soft limits. I set the maximum Z offset to 5mm (0.0196") below X max. In your config the Z home was 0.001" below the Z max while still active.Changed to -0.2. Seemed to work fine now!
Why does that make a difference??
I will need to fix the docs and maybe have a popup warning when LinuxCNC is loaded when it finds the settings may cause issues.
One thing I dont quite understand is when I home my Z now, it parks it -0.2 down, but I can jog up past that. To 0.050" below the limit switch.
my X and Y are set up similarly to how Z was. Do they need to be changed?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
Because that is the max limit. If you start a program from that position then you will likely see this issue.[One thing I dont quite understand is when I home my Z now, it parks it -0.2 down, but I can jog up past that. To 0.050" below the limit switch.
No they should be fine.my X and Y are set up similarly to how Z was. Do they need to be changed?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
It doesn't appear to cause the issue for whatever reason. But I don't want to tempt fate, so how do I prevent it from letting me park it that high then? Because I'm used to jogging it to the top before doing a run.Because that is the max limit. If you start a program from that position then you will likely see this issue.
I'm not fully wrapping my head around what's going on here, for some reason.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- phillc54
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 5698
- Thank you received: 2081
It is probably my explanation...
Edit: do you use a pendant?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snowgoer540
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2393
- Thank you received: 782
True, but I often jog the torch down so I can see where it's going to end up when I'm touching off. When I jog back up, it doesnt stop at the -0.2, goes happily up to where the offset is from homing.You could just home your machine and leave the Z axis where it is.
It is probably my explanation...
Edit: do you use a pendant?
No pendant here..yet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.